Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

We should not promise credit for cc0 samples #35

Closed
SirBothersome opened this issue Jul 19, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

We should not promise credit for cc0 samples #35

SirBothersome opened this issue Jul 19, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@SirBothersome
Copy link
Contributor

SirBothersome commented Jul 19, 2017

@Hussam-Eddin-Alhomsi I noticed this change to our readme
nono hussam

Please do not offer credit for cc0 samples as this has greatly complicated matters in the past.
LMMS/lmms#1589
@tresf, @Umcaruje, while this is a voluntary offer, I still deleted the credit offer to be sure, if I'm wrong, please let me know.

@Sawuare
Copy link
Member

Sawuare commented Jul 19, 2017

This isn't a new change that was introduced with my last big commit. It has been there for a while.
The samples are licensed under CC0, we can give credit or not, however, since this is an open-source project and the number of contributers isn't limited, I think we shouldn't offer credit.

@SirBothersome
Copy link
Contributor Author

SirBothersome commented Jul 19, 2017

@Hussam-Eddin-Alhomsi I apologize for attributing the offer to you then... I had seen your recent commit and thought you put it there. My mistake. Please do take a gander at #1589 though

@SirBothersome SirBothersome changed the title We cannot promise credit for cc0 samples We should not promise credit for cc0 samples Jul 19, 2017
@Sawuare
Copy link
Member

Sawuare commented Jul 19, 2017

@SirBothersome It's OK. 🙂

@Sawuare Sawuare closed this as completed Sep 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants