-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
blower: ensure presence and functionality #1
Comments
For temporary exhaust routing, add a T junction to exhaust fan duct (PVC) overhead in garage, adjacent to exit from garage, and run flex tubing from laser, via rafters, to the T junction. Should have louver-style air handling valves to prevent backflow into either pipe, as the tube draws from (and could return to) house air. |
Tim says he's trying vent fans from Vevor, says they are much quieter than the "big bois" and rated for twice the CFM (a rating which Tim questions, but the quieterness is nice). |
As I prep tubing for exhaust, I'm curious about reasons for and against including a dust collection system somewhere along the way before the output air (with all of its fumes and combustion byproducts) gets pushed into the world at large... |
A common method for air filtration is to use a pre-filter, an activated
carbon filter, and a HEPA filter. This ensures that any unsafe particulates
are caught in the filter, and the air will be much safer to breathe. You
can either apply the filter to your laser cutter's exhaust or duct the air
into a fume coffin.
…On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 1:14 AM Venn Wylder ***@***.***> wrote:
As I prep tubing for exhaust, I'm curious about reasons for and against
including a dust collection system somewhere along the way before the
output air (with all of its fumes and combustion byproducts) gets pushed
into the world at large...
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOGLWVDMRCLWR7P67AQ2U3ZXT6C3AVCNFSM6AAAAABOGI47FSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNRVGAYDKNZRGA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
(cited) I never paid attention to the exhaust filtering setup at Chatt*Lab (@ttsgeb?), but the consensus(1234) seems to be that if you cut certain materials, lasers make nasty fumes, AKA "LGACs" (Laser Generated Air Contaminants). LGACs are primarily a concern when cutting certain metals or plastics5; if those types of materials are on the menu, and you're going to be cutting them in quantity, definitely get a filter. Footnotes |
Okay, so I definitely want to construct an exhaust vent filtration system. Next questions / todos are around defining specs for that device and system.
|
820m^3/h. Per manual.
The coffin method is cool. Beware front filter being anything that melts.
…On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 8:24 AM Venn Wylder ***@***.***> wrote:
Okay, so I definitely want to construct an exhaust vent filtration system.
Next questions / todos are around defining specs for that device and system.
- define/identify CFM flow specification for exhaust ventilation from
150W CO2 laser cutter
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOGLWTXDGJWRYUWFWWY3ITZYACARAVCNFSM6AAAAABOGI47FSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNRYGA3DCOBZGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
In this I read "leave ample room for exhaust to cool before it hits anything temperature-sensitive." |
also noting here, for future reference, that 820m3/h is just under 490 CFM (cubic feet per minute). |
I’ve seen paper cinder and fly into the vent, melting a hepa. Metal grid
went before.
…On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 10:19 AM Venn Wylder ***@***.***> wrote:
Beware front filter being anything that melts.
In this I read "leave ample room for exhaust to cool before it hits
anything temperature-sensitive."
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOGLWVSQ6J5IUAZCG65XVLZYAPQHAVCNFSM6AAAAABOGI47FSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNRYGQZDGMBWGI>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Adding to concept plan: metal wire mesh grid pre-prefilter. |
ventilation plan:
|
I’d rather metal than PVC for heat reasons. This is an hvac kinda thing
maybe pvc is ok just check?
Not sure I’ve seen a mix with plumbing. No idea if that passes code.
And yes flex tubing but metal. Sounds like you figured it all out! In a
commercial building I’d defer to certified hvac.
…On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 10:58 AM Venn Wylder ***@***.***> wrote:
ventilation plan:
1. metal wire mesh pre-prefilter on camfive air outlets
2. 6" flex tubing to fume coffin
<https://www.instructables.com/Fume-Coffin-Laser-Cutter-Exhaust-Vent-Filter/>
(eventually install Pre-Filter Addendum
<https://www.instructables.com/Fume-Coffin-Pre-Filter/>) — need to
redesign for higher CFM throughput; this design is specced for 100CFM and
we need more like 500.
3. 6" flex tubing from blower output on fume coffin up to right-angle
turn PVC pipe in rafters; simultaneously or in-line with right-angle joint,
step down to 4" PVC
4. run 4" PVC to in-line 4" VEVOR blower (plug in adjacent to garage
door opener)
5. run 4" PVC to 90º turn with valve flaps (to prevent backdraft from
other devices on same exhaust pipe)
6. T-join (or angle-in join) PVC connection with existing exhaust
vent, with added valve flaps (to prevent backdraft into conditioned
interior home air from laser exhaust)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOGLWUEH4A5NNP5WQSXCWTZYAUC5AVCNFSM6AAAAABOGI47FSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNRYGU2DKMRYGY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
with the VEVOR filter, we might:
|
It's worth noting that the inline blower I'm using is an 8'' one, and it does struggle to keep up with heavy usage. Chattlab doesn't have any filtration at all, they just pump it all into the atmosphere and this is definitely fine and not a major concern that everyone refuses to address. |
Does the flow not match the machines?
I hate bringing up Generator, but that is my experience and they just pump
it right to the outside. They did internal filtering for a while, but
didn’t want to change HEPA filters so that was thousands of dollars gone.
Plus it was in downtown Burlington and we got so many complaints from
people cutting acrylic and rubber and all kinds of stuff. I don’t think
there’s any actual danger when it gets that dispersed into the air.
Definitely not more than the factories were surrounded by perhaps just
taking a walk along the highway is worse but you expect smells there and
your neighbors do not and I don’t want anyone to get in trouble it’s
simple enough to do upfront to ensure that everyone is safe and on board.
Something about taking reasonable measures or something. Despite the flow
rate of the fan, it’s going to be a little bit different with all the
different diameters in the filtration‘s so I personally want to know what
the rate is at the end because I like efficiency. And I certainly don’t
wanna breathe any of this, and I’ve done that far too much by the
inadequate ventilation at Generator
They actually hired a friend who knew what they were doing so they said and
they used plastic 4 inch duct, which ended up with holes melted in it, and
no one Iistened.
I guess I’ll be devils advocate, and go by the request of op opinions for
and against and you would save money and time by not doing any filtration
whatsoever and you have better airflow with minimum risk to the
environment. But yeah I People would smell it and wondering if you’re
making meth
…On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 8:12 PM ttsgeb ***@***.***> wrote:
It's worth noting that the inline blower I'm using is an 8'' one, and it
does struggle to keep up with heavy usage.
Chattlab doesn't have any filtration at all, they just pump it all into
the atmosphere and this is definitely fine and not a major concern that
everyone refuses to address.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOGLWUSANP5ZEUHIOJL6DLZYCVAPAVCNFSM6AAAAABOGI47FSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNRZHAZDCMBUGI>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
To be clear, the "definitely fine" bit was completely sarcasm. CFM ratings on fans are relatively meaningless without indications of pressures involved. The inline fan can move a lot of CFM in a world where there are no restrictions on flow, but the use in the laser systems results in substantial flow restrictions so the fan can't reach its advertised numbers. Adding filtration complicates that further. A potential solution would be to include several suction fans on a fume coffin that is designed to equally disperse flow across all of them. Effectively, you'd want to measure CFM of the shipped system and then build your filtration such that measured CFM through it and all related piping exceeds the original system. This enables you to successfully evacuate the laser to design spec while still leaving overhead for degradation of filter media. Another data point is that the system the laser I most recently installed shipped with is advertised as to fully exchange the enclosed volume every 5-10 seconds. This is almost adequate, so seeking to exchange every 2-5 seconds would probably be adequate. Assuming the vented enclosure has a volume of 60 sqft, you would want to aim to be filtering >1200cfm of air through your exhaust. Filtering less than 400cfm would likely be the limit where it becomes actively inadequate. When considering the restrictions added by the ductwork, two of the Vevor units linked above would likely be around the minimum for adequate exhaust filtration. (I am not a flow engineer, this is not legal advice) |
This vevor scrubber, also linked in my above comment, around which I designed the sequence described in this above comment, is rated by VEVOR at 800 CFM with its manufacturer-supplied filters in place. The camfive laser is specced for just under 489 CFM. 800 CFM should suffice. With added pressure differentials from the presence of the laser enclosure (restricting inflow) and downstream exhaust venting ducts (restricting outflow), it might not sustain 800 CFM. It's conceivable it could drop below 500 CFM. That's why my design in the above-referenced comments includes an inline VEVOR duct fan in the PVC sequence in the rafters beside the garage door opener (placed just so because rafters, power supply, and PVC ducting all line up in that spot). See point 4 in the first comment. If that's all insufficient, the simplest fix I see is to use two of the scrubbers, swap the pre-filter union (upsizing a pair of 6" exhaust ducts to the 15.5" intake) for a post-filter union (downsizing a pair of 8.5" exhaust ports to a single 4" duct; keeping the metal screens in the rig where we still need to upsize the flexible 6" aluminum ducts to the 15.5" air intake on the scrubbers), and get 1600 CFM of filtered exhaust vent fans feeding into the exhaust ducts. Seems excessive, but we do like clean air. I suspect the inline duct fan in the rafters would remain essential, in this configuration, for helping all the pressure coming out of those scrubbers find its way down the vents and out to the exhaust port on the side of the house. |
I understand this. The reason I said two of the scrubbers is because in looking deeper into it, I found comments from Vevor that the scrubbers are actually rated as "400-800" cfm, so the 800 number is absolute ideal conditions with no added restrictions and the 400 number is likely poor conditions with no added restrictions. Considering there will be added restrictions and I already have experience with items from this company rated in excess of 800cfm not effectively removing the exhaust from the machine, I highly doubt that a single scrubber as linked, even with an added inline fan, will be suitable. |
Vevor fans ordered — one for inline ducting in rafters, one for filtration of exhaust from machine. Expected delivery by 3 October 2024. |
@ttsgeb how are your Vevor exhaust fans doing with the heat of the air coming out of the cutters? And what's the ducting that you use — metal or pvc? |
(Also @ttsgeb — have you measured that exhaust temp anywhere?) |
TL;DR at 400cfm with a 130W laser continuous, and generating say 500W from burning material, you should generate a If we ignore that the density of air varies with temperature: at STP, 1m^3 of air is about 1kg. The specific heat of air at the same temperature is about 1kJ/kg*degK. Let's say we move 400cfm =~ 630 / 0.19 m^3/s / 1000 J / kg * degK * 1 kg/m^3 = Other errata:
Factors seen and discarded:
(Edit: obviously there'll still be particulate condensed and cooled from the flame, but unless you expect to be unable to control the fire at the laser-point, you don't have to deal with temperature, only particulate.) |
New ducting plan:
Might want to return 4" Vevor in-line duct fan and replace with 6" model, need to [ ] check tolerances on available soffit vents vs clearance at intended installation site. |
I have never actually noticed any issues with exhaust temperatures. It is almost exclusively smoke and resin vapors that cool substantially even by the time they are evacuated from the machine. The main issue with heat is going to happen when there's enough associated mass to cause a problem. Where you might see this is if embers from cutting cardboard make it through the exhaust system, or exceptionally well heated small bits of wood. The real thing to watch is to ensure that your hose doesn't fill with debris or become so heavily coated in residue that the non-hose materials inside the hose offer fuel that can be ignited by an ember. |
The seller does not have a blower for us.
The blower is shown here: https://laboratoryb.github.io/camfive/docs/Laser_Machine_INSTALLATION_MANUAL.pdf#page=8
Jake may have access to a blower.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: