You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we were using Blawx to do semantic relevance searching, the output would be the sections and sub-sections that were relevant, which would be best visualized as a ternary status tree, where each node is either relevant, irrelevant, or partially relevant, and you can dig inside it to see which specific sub-parts are relevant. Would be nice to be able to display relevance that way in the scenario editor, and elsewhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we were using Blawx to do semantic relevance searching, the output would be the sections and sub-sections that were relevant, which would be best visualized as a ternary status tree, where each node is either relevant, irrelevant, or partially relevant, and you can dig inside it to see which specific sub-parts are relevant. Would be nice to be able to display relevance that way in the scenario editor, and elsewhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: