Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚨 [security] Update puma 6.3.0 → 6.3.1 (patch) #1207

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Aug 18, 2023


🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ puma (6.3.0 → 6.3.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in puma

Impact

Prior to version 6.3.1, puma exhibited incorrect behavior when parsing chunked transfer encoding bodies and zero-length Content-Length headers in a way that allowed HTTP request smuggling.

The following vulnerabilities are addressed by this advisory:

  • Incorrect parsing of trailing fields in chunked transfer encoding bodies
  • Parsing of blank/zero-length Content-Length headers\r\n

Patches

The vulnerability has been fixed in 6.3.1 and 5.6.7.

Workarounds

No known workarounds.

References

HTTP Request Smuggling

🚨 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in puma

Impact

Prior to version 6.3.1, puma exhibited incorrect behavior when parsing chunked transfer encoding bodies and zero-length Content-Length headers in a way that allowed HTTP request smuggling.

The following vulnerabilities are addressed by this advisory:

  • Incorrect parsing of trailing fields in chunked transfer encoding bodies
  • Parsing of blank/zero-length Content-Length headers\r\n

Patches

The vulnerability has been fixed in 6.3.1 and 5.6.7.

Workarounds

No known workarounds.

References

HTTP Request Smuggling

Release Notes

6.3.1

  • Security
    • Address HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities with zero-length Content Length header and trailer fields (GHSA-68xg-gqqm-vgj8)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 2 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Aug 18, 2023
@mitlib mitlib temporarily deployed to thesis-submit-pr-1207 August 18, 2023 10:35 Inactive
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 98.313%. remained the same when pulling 77c02a5 on depfu/update/puma-6.3.1 into c414177 on main.

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Aug 24, 2023

Closing because this update has already been applied

@depfu depfu bot closed this Aug 24, 2023
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/puma-6.3.1 branch August 24, 2023 14:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants