You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we later realized that the BP86 versions in ORCA and MRChem are not identical, implying that a comparison of GTO to MW at the BP86 level would be affected by differences in the implementation of the functional, which our tests indicated could amount to several kcal/mol, when approaching the CBS limit
it sounds like MRChem would greatly benefit from an interface to Libxc which offers a consistent, reusable set of functionals across >40 programs including ORCA. Would you be interested in such an interface?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is indeed something we have contemplated doing for a long time. The point of XCFun was automatic differentiation to go to high order response. This has so far not yet happened. But in the meantime the development of XCFun has more or less stagnated whereas LibXC is the de-facto standard.
I am also involved, with a minor role, in a ITN application where MRChem will be used for benchmarks. The need to use more modern fuctionals in MRChem is very rellevant for that too!
Hi,
referring to J. Chem. Phys. 154, 214302 (2021)
it sounds like MRChem would greatly benefit from an interface to Libxc which offers a consistent, reusable set of functionals across >40 programs including ORCA. Would you be interested in such an interface?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: