[WIP] Make array handling in converts as generic as possible

[asinghvi17]

Description

Fixes #2753

Allows OffsetArrays, and generally any array which overloads Base.axes, to be plotted with the correct indices by any SurfaceLike or VolumeLike plot. Changes here might conflict with #2573 so we could merge after or into that PR.

Type of change

Delete options that do not apply:

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

• Add converts for PointBased functions when only one array is provided
• Added an entry in NEWS.md (for new features and breaking changes)
• Added or changed relevant sections in the documentation
• Added unit tests for new algorithms, conversion methods, etc.
• Added reference image tests for new plotting functions, recipes, visual options, etc.

[MakieBot]

Compile Times benchmark

Note, that these numbers may fluctuate on the CI servers, so take them with a grain of salt. All benchmark results are based on the mean time and negative percent mean faster than the base branch. Note, that GLMakie + WGLMakie run on an emulated GPU, so the runtime benchmark is much slower. Results are from running:

using_time = @ctime using Backend
# Compile time
create_time = @ctime fig = scatter(1:4; color=1:4, colormap=:turbo, markersize=20, visible=true)
display_time = @ctime Makie.colorbuffer(display(fig))
# Runtime
create_time = @benchmark fig = scatter(1:4; color=1:4, colormap=:turbo, markersize=20, visible=true)
display_time = @benchmark Makie.colorbuffer(display(fig))

	using	create	display	create	display
GLMakie	14.15s (13.78, 14.44) 0.22+-	1.32s (1.29, 1.36) 0.02+-	904.43ms (881.70, 975.84) 32.15+-	14.33ms (13.74, 14.96) 0.44+-	165.33ms (161.68, 169.09) 2.43+-
master	13.96s (13.60, 14.29) 0.24+-	1.37s (1.30, 1.40) 0.04+-	855.01ms (821.57, 883.57) 21.00+-	14.01ms (13.78, 14.19) 0.17+-	167.06ms (164.83, 169.34) 1.73+-
evaluation	+1.33%, 0.19s invariant (0.80d, 0.16p, 0.23std)	-4.00%, -0.05s faster ✓ (-1.68d, 0.01p, 0.03std)	+5.46%, 49.42ms slower❌ (1.82d, 0.01p, 26.58std)	+2.27%, 0.32ms invariant (0.97d, 0.11p, 0.31std)	-1.05%, -1.73ms invariant (-0.82d, 0.15p, 2.08std)
CairoMakie	11.70s (11.54, 11.96) 0.16+-	1.28s (1.27, 1.31) 0.01+-	269.32ms (262.30, 277.32) 5.85+-	15.11ms (14.93, 15.28) 0.14+-	8.25ms (8.03, 8.45) 0.18+-
master	11.87s (11.45, 12.25) 0.27+-	1.28s (1.24, 1.33) 0.03+-	265.84ms (256.70, 272.28) 5.23+-	15.50ms (15.13, 15.85) 0.27+-	8.33ms (8.20, 8.47) 0.10+-
evaluation	-1.42%, -0.17s invariant (-0.75d, 0.19p, 0.22std)	+0.22%, 0.0s invariant (0.11d, 0.84p, 0.02std)	+1.29%, 3.47ms invariant (0.63d, 0.26p, 5.54std)	-2.56%, -0.39ms faster ✓ (-1.81d, 0.01p, 0.20std)	-1.07%, -0.09ms invariant (-0.61d, 0.28p, 0.14std)
WGLMakie	16.98s (16.61, 17.79) 0.45+-	1.55s (1.48, 1.58) 0.03+-	16.14s (15.56, 17.21) 0.54+-	21.26ms (19.64, 24.85) 1.70+-	1.54s (1.39, 1.79) 0.14+-
master	16.78s (15.58, 18.03) 0.78+-	1.60s (1.56, 1.66) 0.03+-	15.92s (15.12, 16.41) 0.49+-	21.98ms (19.57, 25.77) 2.11+-	1.54s (1.44, 1.67) 0.09+-
evaluation	+1.20%, 0.2s invariant (0.32d, 0.56p, 0.62std)	-3.05%, -0.05s faster ✓ (-1.40d, 0.02p, 0.03std)	+1.40%, 0.23s invariant (0.44d, 0.43p, 0.52std)	-3.37%, -0.72ms invariant (-0.37d, 0.50p, 1.91std)	+0.60%, 0.01s invariant (0.08d, 0.89p, 0.11std)

[SimonDanisch]

I think we can merge this, but should add a test first!

[SimonDanisch]

Ok, added some tests and cleaned it up... But I think we need to make this a breaking change.
the 0..n doesn't make any sense with axes/firstindex, and we might want to rethink that...

[github-actions]

Missing reference images

Found 1 new images without existing references.
Upload new reference images before merging this PR.

[asinghvi17]

This is still unmerged AFAIK. Should we target breaking-0.21 for this? If so I can clean up the implementation and remove the Float32 converts.

CC @SimonDanisch