You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As one of the point to be resolved in #3, this issue to gather the idea what should be inside the DISO-sim module. So far, we have gathered several points:
Include Materials Design Ontology (MDO) core to define a set of simulation. MDO core could describe the structure used as input and output for a simulation/calculation, the calculated property (scalar) resulted from a simulation, physical property used as e.g., materials properties, etc.
What are missing in the MDO core for the DISO-sim module are the class to describe a dislocation microstructure and a class to describe a calculated property of vector/tensor.
If we define the dislocation microstructure, what is the relation to physical CrystallineMaterial class?
How to define the geometry of dislocation microstructure? e.g., defining the geometry boundary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As one of the point to be resolved in #3, this issue to gather the idea what should be inside the DISO-sim module. So far, we have gathered several points:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: