Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uncompressed packages should not have a <package> entry #8

Open
robertknight opened this issue Sep 26, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

Uncompressed packages should not have a <package> entry #8

robertknight opened this issue Sep 26, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@robertknight
Copy link
Contributor

The updater binary normally goes in its own 'package' which is not compressed - eg. there is a package called 'updater.exe' whose only file is 'updater.exe'.

There are two issues with this:

  • The need to add a package with the same name as the updater and containing only the updater in the config file is not obvious.
  • The generated file_list.xml file has a entry in the Updater.exe section, which should be removed. Otherwise the updater will try to install updater.exe from a package called updater.exe.zip.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant