Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cherry-pick: @metamask/ppom-validator fix #27945

Conversation

cryptodev-2s
Copy link
Contributor

@cryptodev-2s cryptodev-2s commented Oct 17, 2024

This PR bumps @metamask/ppom-validator from 0.34.0 to 0.35.1

Open in GitHub Codespaces

Fixes: #27909

  • I've followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Extension Coding
    Standards
    .

  • I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability

  • I’ve included tests if applicable

  • I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable

  • I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).

  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.


Description

Open in GitHub Codespaces

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

  1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

@cryptodev-2s cryptodev-2s requested review from a team as code owners October 17, 2024 19:36
Copy link
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Oct 17, 2024

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@babel/generator@7.25.5 None 0 489 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/helper-create-class-features-plugin@7.25.4 None +2 613 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/helper-module-imports@7.24.7 None 0 63.7 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/helper-plugin-utils@7.24.8 None 0 114 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/helper-replace-supers@7.25.0 None +1 834 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/helper-simple-access@7.24.7 None 0 14.1 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/helper-skip-transparent-expression-wrappers@7.24.7 None 0 58.5 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/helper-validator-option@7.24.8 None 0 11.8 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/plugin-syntax-jsx@7.24.7 None 0 70 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/plugin-syntax-typescript@7.25.4 None 0 69.7 kB existentialism, hzoo, jlhwung, ...1 more
npm/@babel/plugin-transform-modules-commonjs@7.24.8 None +1 267 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/plugin-transform-typescript@7.25.2 None 0 200 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/preset-typescript@7.24.7 None 0 90.8 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/runtime@7.25.4 None 0 248 kB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/types@7.25.4 environment 0 2.48 MB nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@metamask/ppom-validator@0.35.1 None 0 122 kB metamaskbot
npm/@metamask/utils@9.3.0 None 0 706 kB metamaskbot

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@babel/generator@7.24.10, npm/@babel/helper-annotate-as-pure@7.22.5, npm/@babel/helper-create-class-features-plugin@7.24.5, npm/@babel/helper-module-imports@7.24.3, npm/@babel/helper-module-transforms@7.24.5, npm/@babel/helper-plugin-utils@7.24.5, npm/@babel/helper-skip-transparent-expression-wrappers@7.22.5, npm/@babel/helper-validator-option@7.23.5, npm/@babel/plugin-syntax-jsx@7.24.1, npm/@babel/plugin-syntax-typescript@7.24.1, npm/@babel/plugin-transform-modules-commonjs@7.24.1, npm/@babel/plugin-transform-typescript@7.24.5, npm/@babel/preset-typescript@7.24.1, npm/@babel/runtime@7.24.8, npm/@babel/traverse@7.24.8, npm/@babel/types@7.24.9, npm/@metamask/ppom-validator@0.34.0

View full report↗︎

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been
completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once.
-->

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

This PR bumps `@metamask/ppom-validator ` from `0.34.0` to `0.35.1`

[![Open in GitHub
Codespaces](https://github.com/codespaces/badge.svg)](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/27939?quickstart=1)

Fixes: #27909

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

- [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask
Extension Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

---------

Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com>
@cryptodev-2s cryptodev-2s force-pushed the cryptodev2s/ppom-controller-fix-cherry-pick branch from dd9f742 to 4111eb3 Compare October 17, 2024 20:52
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 17, 2024
@cryptodev-2s
Copy link
Contributor Author

@metamaskbot update-policies

@cryptodev-2s
Copy link
Contributor Author

closed as already done in #27944

@metamaskbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Policies updated.
👀 Please review the diff for suspicious new powers.

🧠 Learn how: https://lavamoat.github.io/guides/policy-diff/#what-to-look-for-when-reviewing-a-policy-diff

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants