-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
CCPP Framework Meeting Minutes 2020 08 06
Dom Heinzeller edited this page Aug 7, 2020
·
4 revisions
- transition to
cap_gen.py
- NRL collaboration
- ccpp-standalone
- other business
- DTC timeline and resource chart (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XbSF1ejYcPMrVtZtk1OSiMX-vI5srLkwEUhyAirGr8k/edit?usp=sharing)
- things that need to happen for transitioning UFS to
cap_gen.py
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M3mCO3ESR9OJqLyUbQf-ahJtmfmGKilZlWaBTxsfMRk/edit?usp=sharing) - CCPP dependencies
- PRs for
ccpp_prebuild.py
: https://github.com/ufs-community/ufs-weather-model/pull/180 - issues: https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-framework/issues/308 and https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-framework/issues/318
- a more generic implementation that adds the
[ccpp-table-properties]
section for module, ddt and scheme tables is preferred - can specify dependencies on multiple lines
- can have a
relative_path
attribute -
[ccpp-table-properties]
mandatory for each module/DDT/scheme - this generic section opens possibilities for future development, e.g. dependencies of primary schemes on interstitial schemes; possibly in combination with a
[ccpp-host-info]/[ccpp-host-properties]
section for host-specific insterstitials?
- PRs for
- Alex and Matus currently updating to latest
ccpp_prebuild.py
in NCAR master - potential issue with module level data used in the auto-generated static API
- this won't be an issue with
cap_gen.py
, where the argument list passed to the static API is generated at compile time (while it is static inccpp_prebuild.py
)
- Should we create a ccpp-standalone repository that contains a toy model to drive (and test!) ccpp-framework and ccpp-physics?
- Better to add a testing harness (dummy host model) to ccpp-framework, see https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-framework/issues/319