Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check impact of wrong binning for ATLAS_1JET_8TEV_R06 #88

Closed
cschwan opened this issue Feb 24, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Check impact of wrong binning for ATLAS_1JET_8TEV_R06 #88

cschwan opened this issue Feb 24, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@cschwan
Copy link
Contributor

cschwan commented Feb 24, 2021

Commit f8da697 fixed a bug which caused some but not all events of the last bin for each slice to be filled into the first bin of the next slice. This should have a large impact on the bin which isn't filled and a negligible impact for the bin that is wrongly filled, see also the comparison in #71.

@cschwan cschwan added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 24, 2021
@cschwan
Copy link
Contributor Author

cschwan commented Feb 26, 2021

After merging the runcards in master and fixing (!?) the bug the agreement that we had in #71 is gone I used the wrong PDF set for the fastNLO results. With the right PDF set I get:

   1.80616397   -0.94215231    1.06026424   -0.18225736    1.30749478
   1.28549939   -1.82677051    1.36270578    2.76659579   -0.07137591
   0.14629259    1.11273104    5.30571544    3.17297151   -3.51791175
   8.33865825    1.13713781    8.37785418    6.50202449    0.61484189
   3.18859883   -4.85667065   -6.95571797   22.28726887    3.74864145
  11.46270867    1.47495604   28.74152348   10.12984224   -2.49142797
  16.82838059   23.27318982   41.35360828   41.47999131   -1.02286874
   1.13710615    1.30323774    0.78010896    0.92715585    3.04904028
  -1.04477589    3.08467155    0.10017694   -1.14072941    6.22587869
   1.62522411    1.13859181   -6.72731537    2.34489562   -0.03675478
  10.24793510    1.20024568   -0.35417985   -3.82267999   -1.10437262
   8.80110223    2.00659348   15.60120570    7.06288259   -5.88044800
  13.84991488  -25.04102698   14.74820902   11.32571496   11.58038068
  38.46450057    7.67723162    4.46815810    0.48277082   -2.82431747
   0.94795642   -1.43125904    2.61184098    1.49447509   -0.66882254
  -1.83025482    4.18396928   -5.86899725    2.17686327   -3.32445355
   0.61942132   -3.31347140    3.71620077   -6.81320136   16.03309378
  -3.76420784    3.26338464   -4.40208688    3.14807478   12.21889112
   3.95084987   15.51754707   24.03945663   -6.18891602   42.31637251
  -5.88679219   18.43715487   20.34494858   -0.46737983    1.44856832
   0.99781540    1.08838879   -2.99576531    2.85416394   -3.28128046
   2.01039045   -1.19565562   -2.59702242    0.61564005    0.82824094
  -2.99736431   -1.06899467   -4.41267842    5.69928650    2.70638721
  11.57642869    7.07184635    8.55610491    8.89078082   11.07972627
  -9.22970614    6.74761273   16.91348796   34.47261314   56.36438438
 -76.02055450   57.59981442   35.66540136   84.83162213    0.55503984
  -7.19470282    4.59385818   -4.49569357   -3.09988065   -7.59586544
   4.02602075    3.00368953   -1.33893151   -6.30262420    7.55693604
   3.30067465    6.06819432    5.92235685   -1.13809478  -12.68789595
  -4.72697518   12.33260763   39.72860248  -17.30139785   40.31187582
  39.43145882   22.78408148    6.52112709   -0.23885471   -4.61009099
  -1.85266652   -2.99795221   -0.91274419    5.79752993    5.47149033
   0.81876820    8.52158964    2.32090069    6.39987133  -11.96042484
  -2.88431334   22.50304218  -31.75662400 -115.99554265  153.44999810
-155.93489170

This is basically the same than the previous comparison.

@cschwan cschwan removed the bug Something isn't working label Mar 1, 2021
@cschwan
Copy link
Contributor Author

cschwan commented Mar 1, 2021

I'm closing this, further comparisons will be done in Issue #84.

@cschwan cschwan closed this as completed Mar 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant