granted: 0.34.1 -> 0.35.2

[jlbribeiro]

• Diff: common-fate/granted@v0.34.1...v0.35.2
• Changelog:
  • https://github.com/common-fate/granted/releases/tag/v0.35.0
  • https://github.com/common-fate/granted/releases/tag/v0.35.1
  • https://github.com/common-fate/granted/releases/tag/v0.35.2
• Maintainers:
  • currently: @ivankovnatsky;
  • after this PR: @jlbribeiro (me), following this comment.

Also adds updateScript (nix-update-script) and versionCheckHook.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[ivankovnatsky]

I'm sorry, I don't use it currently, but otherwise it looks good, thanks.

[jlbribeiro]

@ivankovnatsky I currently use it at work; would you want me to replace you as a maintainer?

edit: Took the liberty of doing just that; please feel free to say you rather just have me be an additional maintainer.
Because I feel maintainer changes are important I'm re-requesting your code review (hope you don't mind), and updating the PR description to reflect that.

(also addressed your whitespace suggestion in the process)

[ivankovnatsky]

@ivankovnatsky I currently use it at work; would you want me to replace you as a maintainer?

Sure thing, totally makes sense! Thanks.

[pjrm]

I've tested on aarch64-darwin and x86_64-linux, and it works as expected.

Thanks 🙏

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4696

[pbsds]

wow it's jarring to be be about to click the merge button, and see it turn gray due to a merge-conflict

conflict with #347816

[jlbribeiro]

@pbsds May I kindly ask you to re-review + merge after the force-push? I've resolved the conflicts (caused by the nixfmt commit).
(easier to review that commit separately from the rest).

edit: also updated to v0.35.2, which was released 3 hours ago.