-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shapley values for interactions between variables #316
Comments
Hi! We have not planned to include it. However, technically it should not be very difficult. I will therefore write it down on the lengthy "nice to have" list. Thanks! |
Thank you. This is much appreciated, having the interactions could be very helpful for certain investigations. Another thought: since run-time will be a potential issue, it could make sense to have an option to specify only a certain subset of variables. Also, in some situations one might only be interested in a very specific order of interactions, e.g. between x1 and x2, x1 and x3, x1 and x4 etc. (ie interactions only to a certain reference variable). |
I have little experience with Shapley interaction values, so I guess I have to read up on it, but is what you are suggesting actually possible? We are using the least-squares analog of the Shapley formula (KernelSHAP) for estimating the Shapley values in this package, and there I can't really decide to leave out any of the Shapley values from the computation...? |
Right, I just had run-time in mind. I agree with you, I don't think it will work to easily restrict it to a subset of variables. |
Will shapley interaction values be supported in the next release?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: