Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New model] Kermut achieves SOTA performance on supervised substitution benchmark #39

Open
petergroth opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@petergroth
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi ProteinGym team!

We would like to submit our model, Kermut, to the supervised substitution benchmark leaderboards, where it achieves state-of-the-art performance across splits.

All code required to run the model has been added to proteingym/baselines/kermut and model details have been added to proteingym/constants.json. We have included a README with detailed instructions on how to access either raw or preprocessed data (recommended) and train/evaluate the model. Our data directory matches that of ProteinGym and should work seamlessly if scripts are called from the ProteinGym root directory. Aggregated results across assays can be found in kermut/results/summary, while the per-variant predictions can be accessed via the README.

To reproduce results, the preprocessed data (e.g., precomputed embeddings) can be downloaded and unzipped as described, after which either example_scripts/benchmark_single_dataset.sh or example_scripts/benchmark_all_datasets.sh can be run. We have a script to merge all individual results (src/results/merge_score_files.py), the output of which can be used directly with performance_DMS_supervised_benchmarks.py. Note that our environment has additional dependencies, all of which are listed in kermut/environment.yaml.

The results in results/summary are from the updated CV splits (see issue), while results for the old splits which can be directly compared to the current leaderboard can be found in results/summary_old.

Thank you for your efforts!

Peter

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant