'Use Cases' section on opendreamkit.org #75
Comments
nthiery
changed the title
|
Related to the forthcoming workshop, maybe
|
|
[ ] Write high-level code that runs at « native speed », either using a
ffi tool or a compiler
That's a very good point: we should have use cases about performance,
and in particular the ease of writing fast code.
There remains to frame this into a compelling user story. Something
that makes a visitor reading the scenario immediately think "ah yes, I
have been in those shoes; many people will need that"!
|
|
A group of coauthors want to collaborate on the GAP code in the GitHub repository, not organising it in a form of GAP package, but using the same as GAP packages for CI and test coverage. Eventually they put a demo of their code in a Jupyter notebook, runnable on Binder, and used the RISE extension to use the same notebook in a slideshow mode. This is https://github.com/sukru-yalcinkaya/unipoly described in the Appendix to D5.15. |
|
A group of coauthors want ...
That sounds very nice! Are you willing to write up a brief use-case
document about it?
|
|
@nthiery I do. They also have a press-release at https://www.mub.eps.manchester.ac.uk/in-abstract/adjoint-representations-of-black-box-groups/. Collaborative visits were supported by CCP-CoDiMa, and then we agreed that this could be a basis for an interesting demonstration of ODK. An abstract use case would go further - start the project this way, instead of organising the code after, and submit is as a supplementary material to the paper when it is published. |
|
We are writing up a use case for MathHub data. |
|
and an announcement of the system itself (for 8/2019) that we should have done earlier. |
|
Katja has written two new posts and committed them, but they are not showing up on the web page (for two hours). |
|
They were missing a .md extension. Fixed.
… Katja has written two new posts and committed them, but they are not showing up on the web page (for two hours).
I wonder whether that is still too busy, ...
|
|
thanks a lot. I had looked and not seen this. Chapeau |
|
@minrk: thanks for the use case on collaboration!
|
Great suggestion!
Yes, I'm working on a demo of this. The Work-in-Progress in JupyterLab is in a bit of a transition, so I'm trying to figure out what will demo best. |
|
Hi @VivianePons, @alex-konovalov, |
|
@nthiery @VivianePons good idea - and also about delivering training (for which they can use our training materials). |
|
(hi)
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 10:15:42AM -0700, Alexander Konovalov wrote:
@nthiery @VivianePons good idea - and also about delivering training (for which they can use our training materials).
And our jupyter-training extension.
…--
Nicolas Chauvat
logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de connaissances
|
|
> @nthiery @VivianePons good idea - and also about delivering training (for which they can use our training materials).
And our jupyter-training extension.
Yes; so really two different use cases:
- Getting training
- Teaching with Jupyter
I added both to my wish list in the first comment of this issue :-)
|
Our web site now has a
Use casessection, currently available from the Project menu. It's meant to hold short documents such as this one with the following structure:Such documents can be both useful to our readers (providing them with operational solutions and best practices) and to us (showcasing our work, with a concrete perspective on the impact of our actions). In particular it will highlight the versatility brought by the toolkit approach.
Currently, there is a single use case; we should write more! By design they can be relatively short and fun to write, so please volunteer.
Here are some suggestions:
Any others welcome!
Once we have enough documents, we should also make the use case section very prominent; possibly moving it to the front page.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: