Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hotfix: structural analysis #937

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

Hotfix: structural analysis #937

merged 12 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

IAlibay
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay commented Sep 16, 2024

Fixes #926

TODO:

  • Move structural analysis writing to npz
  • Write results accessor
  • Tests
  • News
  • Fix CI

Developers certificate of origin

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.84%. Comparing base (117ce98) to head (f4a7930).
Report is 149 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
openfe/protocols/openmm_rfe/equil_rfe_methods.py 57.14% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #937      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.59%   92.84%   -1.75%     
==========================================
  Files         134      134              
  Lines        9931     9934       +3     
==========================================
- Hits         9394     9223     -171     
- Misses        537      711     +174     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 92.84% <83.33%> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Sep 16, 2024

Hello @IAlibay! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

Line 2112:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)

Comment last updated at 2024-09-18 02:06:06 UTC

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member Author

IAlibay commented Sep 16, 2024

@hannahbaumann @dotsdl - I think this should work, fixing the giant JSON results file issue whilst keeping the same things around as before (there's deeper issues with structural analysis correctness, but we'll need to deal with this later).

@IAlibay IAlibay changed the title [WIP] Hotfix: structural analysis Hotfix: structural analysis Sep 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@hannahbaumann hannahbaumann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @IAlibay , just the one comment, other than that it looks good to me!

Copy link
Member

@dotsdl dotsdl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Some comments to address, but none major or blocking. Thanks @IAlibay!

openfe/protocols/openmm_rfe/equil_rfe_methods.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@IAlibay IAlibay merged commit f4475bf into main Sep 18, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@IAlibay IAlibay deleted the hotfix-struct-analysis branch September 18, 2024 02:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ProtocolDAGResults produced by RelativeHybridTopologyProtocol can grow very large in typical usage
4 participants