-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
InstantOn Standalone MP features #7005
Comments
I think it would be more clear if we did the work to auto-generate a table of InstantOn supported features based on the value of the
vs this for features that are enabled when running the beta image:
|
I agree, but that seems like a more long-term solution vs updating the current wording for this case. |
Hi @mbroz2 @tjwatson - I've fixed the typo and added the following text to clarify that MP standalone features are not currently supported by InstantOn (new text in italics):
If any further edits are needed, just let me know. Thanks! |
@cbridgha any idea what level of effort it would take to have the generated docs reflect Tom's comment? |
Document: Faster startup for containerized applications with Open Liberty InstantOn
http://openliberty.io/docs/latest/instanton.html
It may not be clear to end users that standalone MP features do not currently have InstantOn support (for example, MP Reactive Messaging). A suggestion would be to alter the wording to something like 'InstantOn supports the features that these [MP/Jakarta] convenience features make available.'
or maybe something like 'Note that standalone MicroProfile features, which are not part of the convenience features, are currently not supported for InstantOn'
Also, there's an instance of "ae" in the doc that should be "are":
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: