NMS-16477: Replace babel/polyfill with corejs3 (foundation-2021) #7386
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
synqotik
force-pushed
the
jira/NMS-16477-replace-babel-polyfill
branch
from
328f64e
to
cb637ae
Compare
synqotik
force-pushed
the
jira/NMS-16477-replace-babel-polyfill
branch
from
79814f6
to
de6f82d
Compare
synqotik
force-pushed
the
jira/NMS-16477-replace-babel-polyfill
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0b8019a
to
53a0813
Compare
synqotik
force-pushed
the
jira/NMS-16477-replace-babel-polyfill
branch
from
cb43985
to
e73dad9
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@babel/polyfillwas deprecated and replaced withcore-js@3back in 2020.polyfillhas some security vulnerabilities. We upgraded tocore-js 3first indevelop, this is to updatefoundation-2021.Update 10/29/2024: We've tested this on
foundation-2021and have not found any issues, so we will merge.External References