docs: fix eda ruff docs linting

[alperenkose]

Description

Tox ruff checks in CI for EDA partner testing was failing due to required linting. This PR fixes the below error for this check to pass.

Motivation and Context

ruff checks was failing because of a blank line required after "Returns" section in docstrings.

ruff: commands[0]> ruff check --select ALL --ignore INP001 -q ../../extensions/eda/plugins
/home/runner/work/pan-os-ansible/pan-os-ansible/extensions/eda/plugins/event_source/logs.py:57:5: D413 [*] Missing blank line after last section ("Returns")
/home/runner/work/pan-os-ansible/pan-os-ansible/extensions/eda/plugins/event_source/logs.py:68:5: D413 [*] Missing blank line after last section ("Returns")
ruff: exit 1 (0.01 seconds) /home/runner/work/pan-os-ansible/pan-os-ansible/.github/workflows> ruff check --select ALL --ignore INP001 -q ../../extensions/eda/plugins pid=[18](https://github.com/PaloAltoNetworks/pan-os-ansible/actions/runs/7958993848/job/21725025183#step:4:19)35
ruff: FAIL ✖ in 2 seconds

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested locally with tox and on CI.

Types of changes

CI tox fix.

Checklist

• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have added tests to cover my changes if appropriate.
• All new and existing tests passed.

[adambaumeister]

Makes sense, that's what I saw as well

[github-actions]

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.20.0 🎉

The release is available on Ansible Galaxy and GitHub release

Posted by semantic-release bot