Bump astro from 3.6.4 to 4.0.2 #111
Pull Request #111 Alerts: Complete with warnings
Report | Status | Message |
---|---|---|
PR #111 Alerts | Found 41 project alerts |
Pull request alerts notify when new issues are detected between the diff of the pull request and it's target branch.
Details
🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.
Next steps
What is dynamic require?
Dynamic require can indicate the package is performing dangerous or unsafe dynamic code execution.
Packages should avoid dynamic imports when possible. Audit the use of dynamic require to ensure it is not executing malicious or vulnerable code.
What is environment variable access?
Package accesses environment variables, which may be a sign of credential stuffing or data theft.
Packages should be clear about which environment variables they access, and care should be taken to ensure they only access environment variables they claim to.
What is filesystem access?
Accesses the file system, and could potentially read sensitive data.
If a package must read the file system, clarify what it will read and ensure it reads only what it claims to. If appropriate, packages can leave file system access to consumers and operate on data passed to it instead.
What is a mixed license?
(Experimental) Package contains multiple licenses.
A new version of the package should be published that includes a single license. Consumers may seek clarification from the package author. Ensure that the license details are consistent across the LICENSE file, package.json license field and license details mentioned in the README.
What is eval?
Package uses eval() which is a dangerous function. This prevents the code from running in certain environments and increases the risk that the code may contain exploits or malicious behavior.
Avoid packages that use eval, since this could potentially execute any code.
What is an empty package?
Package does not contain any code. It may be removed, is name squatting, or the result of a faulty package publish.
Remove dependencies that do not export any code or functionality and ensure the package version includes all of the files it is supposed to.
What's wrong with long strings?
Contains long string literals, which may be a sign of obfuscated or packed code.
Avoid publishing or consuming obfuscated or bundled code. It makes dependencies difficult to audit and undermines the module resolution system.
What are unpublished packages?
Package version was not found on the registry. It may exist on a different registry and need to be configured to pull from that registry.
Packages can be removed from the registry by manually un-publishing, a security issue removal, or may simply never have been published to the registry. Reliance on these packages will cause problem when they are not found.
What is a major refactor?
Package has recently undergone a major refactor. It may be unstable or indicate significant internal changes. Use caution when updating to versions that include significant changes.
Consider waiting before upgrading to see if any issues are discovered, or be prepared to scrutinize any bugs or subtle changes the major refactor may bring. Publishers my consider publishing beta versions of major refactors to limit disruption to parties interested in the new changes.
What are unmaintained packages?
Package has not been updated in more than a year and may be unmaintained. Problems with the package may go unaddressed.
Package should publish periodic maintenance releases if they are maintained, or deprecate if they have no intention in further maintenance.
Take a deeper look at the dependency
Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.
Remove the package
If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.
Mark a package as acceptable risk
To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore
followed by a space separated list of package-name@version
specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore foo@1.0.0 bar@*
or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all
@SocketSecurity ignore rollup@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore astro@4.0.2
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-android-arm64@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-darwin-x64@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore @rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc@4.6.1
@SocketSecurity ignore base-64@1.0.0
@SocketSecurity ignore flattie@1.1.0
@SocketSecurity ignore vite@5.0.5
@SocketSecurity ignore remark-rehype@11.0.0
@SocketSecurity ignore rehype-parse@9.0.0
@SocketSecurity ignore remark-stringify@11.0.0