Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I just spoke with Rosemary Garcia at DOR, who thought these cases would still be eligible for the minimum benefit, but wasn't sure and will have a policy person contact me to confirm. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Andy Van Gerpen from DOR just replied:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Washington makes EITC-eligible households eligible for the WFTC, though the amounts phase out with income. I'm not certain if, based on the law and the Department of Revenue's website, EITC-eligible households that would be fully phased out are still eligible for the minimum benefit.
Consider a single adult with no children. The law states:
The phase-out income appears to refer to the income at which the EITC is fully phased out, which is $16,480. So it starts phasing out at $16,480 - $2,500 = $13,980. If their income is $15,500, their pre-minimum WFTC would be the $300 maximum credit minus 18% of (15500 - 13980) = $300 - 18% * $1,520 = $300 - $273.60 = $26.40. Per this section, they would get $50.
And we show them getting $50 (from the docs):
But what if their income is $16,000? They are still eligible for the EITC but the benefit is fully phased out (
0.18 * (16000-13980) = 363.60 > 300
). Theuntil the minimum credit amount as specified in (c) of this subsection is reached
suggests they might still be eligible for the minimum benefit, but why would (c) saygreater than or equal to one cent, but less than $50
if the true criterion for receiving the minimum benefit is being an eligible household?The DOR website also suggests that they'd still be eligible for the minimum benefit until the EITC thresholds (which are what the second and third columns represent):
I'm going to call the DOR to request clarification this morning.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions