✅ Test freeze restrictions on evaluations

[JuaniRios]

What?

• Test what happens when you evaluate with frozen balance, i.e. a hold on a freeze.

Why?

• To double-check our assumptions about these interactions

How?

• An evaluator holds ED + an amount frozen.
• It uses that frozen amount to evaluate
• The project fails
• He get's slashed
• The treasury receives the slashed amount as free balance
• The evaluator ends up with less free balance than the original freeze restriction (intended)

Testing?

can_evaluate_with_frozen_tokens inside 2_evaluation.rs

Anything Else?

Next PRs will do the same for other participation types

[JuaniRios]

• ✅ Test freeze restrictions on contributions #308 : 3 dependent PRs (#310 , #311 , #312 )
• ✅ Test freeze restrictions on bids #307
• ✅ Test freeze restrictions on evaluations #306 👈
• ✅ Comprehensive settlement tests #304
• ✅ Comprehensive funding end tests #303 : 1 other dependent PR (#315 )
• 🕵🏻 Double-check evaluation reward benchmarks #302
• 💀 New Benchmarks #301
• ✨ Optimize wap calculation #299 : 1 other dependent PR (#300 )
• 🎨 Restructure funding functions file #296
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @JuaniRios and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Auto-assign PRs to author" took an action on this PR • (05/27/24)

1 assignee was added to this PR based on Juan Ignacio Rios's automation.

[vstam1]

Think we could simplify this test quite a bit. Let me know what you think

[JuaniRios]

Merge activity

• Jun 11, 10:37 AM EDT: @JuaniRios started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Jun 11, 10:38 AM EDT: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
• Jun 11, 10:39 AM EDT: @JuaniRios merged this pull request with Graphite.