🧑‍💻 Optional ED inclusion on inst PLMC calculations

[JuaniRios]

What?

• Make it possible to add the ED amount to PLMC calculations on evaluations/auctions/contributions

Why?

• To avoid having to calculate and mint the ED separately

How?

• Add a new bool with_ed to the functions

Testing?

Existing tests should pass, now that a lot of them were updated

[JuaniRios]

• 🧑‍💻 Optional ED inclusion on inst PLMC calculations #311 👈
• ✅ Test freeze restrictions on contributions #308 : 2 other dependent PRs (#310 , #312 )
• ✅ Test freeze restrictions on bids #307
• ✅ Test freeze restrictions on evaluations #306
• ✅ Comprehensive settlement tests #304
• ✅ Comprehensive funding end tests #303 : 1 other dependent PR (#315 )
• 🕵🏻 Double-check evaluation reward benchmarks #302
• 💀 New Benchmarks #301
• ✨ Optimize wap calculation #299 : 1 other dependent PR (#300 )
• 🎨 Restructure funding functions file #296
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @JuaniRios and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Auto-assign PRs to author" took an action on this PR • (05/31/24)

1 assignee was added to this PR based on Juan Ignacio Rios's automation.

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Auto-assign PRs to author" took an action on this PR • (05/31/24)

1 assignee was added to this PR based on Juan Ignacio Rios's automation.

[vstam1]

Nice, think this is a step in the right direction. I would love to simplify the token minting/assertion interface (not sure yet how) in the long run.

[JuaniRios]

Merge activity

• Jun 11, 10:46 AM EDT: @JuaniRios started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Jun 11, 10:47 AM EDT: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
• Jun 11, 10:48 AM EDT: @JuaniRios merged this pull request with Graphite.