You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With #281 we added CI test coverage for ZKAPAuthorizer vs a supposedly-recent version of Tahoe-LAFS master. For this to actually be a recent version, it needs to be updated sometimes. At the moment, the update process is manual. It would be less ongoing work if some automation did this for us. A nice workflow might be for some system to generate a PR against the main branch that bumps the revision to whatever is current at the time the PR is created and for this to happen regularly (eg, once a week). It might make sense to delay this work until ZKAPAuthorizer finds its long-term home (which may not be on GitHub) - to avoid building a lot of GitLab-specific automation that becomes obsolete.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Now we integrate against Tahoe-LAFS master using a Nix Flake input which is even easier to update. Just run nix flake lock --update-input tahoe-lafs-dev.
With #281 we added CI test coverage for ZKAPAuthorizer vs a supposedly-recent version of Tahoe-LAFS master. For this to actually be a recent version, it needs to be updated sometimes. At the moment, the update process is manual. It would be less ongoing work if some automation did this for us. A nice workflow might be for some system to generate a PR against the main branch that bumps the revision to whatever is current at the time the PR is created and for this to happen regularly (eg, once a week). It might make sense to delay this work until ZKAPAuthorizer finds its long-term home (which may not be on GitHub) - to avoid building a lot of GitLab-specific automation that becomes obsolete.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: