Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove redundant code #780

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024
Merged

refactor: remove redundant code #780

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

zakir-code
Copy link
Contributor

@zakir-code zakir-code commented Oct 24, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new variable for managing outgoing transaction pools, marked as deprecated to streamline functionality.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed deprecated methods and constants related to bridge token management, simplifying the interface.
  • Refactor

    • Eliminated unused functions and constants to enhance code clarity and maintainability.
  • Chores

    • Removed mock interfaces and methods related to bridge token management to reduce complexity in testing.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on the removal of unused functions, constants, and interfaces related to token management and telemetry. Key modifications include the deletion of the SetGaugeLabelsWithCoins function in telemetry/metrics.go, the removal of the NewPubKeyFromHex function in testutil/helpers/key.go, and the elimination of the BridgeTokenKeeper interface in x/crosschain/types/expected_keepers.go. Additionally, several deprecated variables and functions are removed to streamline the codebase.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
telemetry/metrics.go Removed function: SetGaugeLabelsWithCoins.
testutil/helpers/key.go Removed function: NewPubKeyFromHex. Removed unused imports.
x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_v1_test.go Removed method: SetToken from KeeperTestSuite.
x/crosschain/migrations/v8/migrate.go Added variable: OutgoingTxPoolKey (deprecated). Marked existing keys as deprecated.
x/crosschain/mock/expected_keepers_mocks.go Removed MockBridgeTokenKeeper interface and associated methods.
x/crosschain/types/expected_keepers.go Removed interface: BridgeTokenKeeper and all associated methods.
x/crosschain/types/key.go Removed constant: OutgoingTxPoolKey and related functions: GetOutgoingTxPoolContractPrefix, GetOutgoingTxPoolKey.
x/crosschain/types/target.go Removed constant: IBCPrefix.

Possibly related PRs

🐇 In the code where I hop and play,
Functions and mocks have gone away.
With fewer keys and simpler ways,
We tidy up for brighter days.
So here’s to changes, swift and bright,
In our code garden, all feels right! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/crosschain/migrations/v8/migrate.go (1)

Line range hint 45-65: Consider optimizing batch processing for large datasets.

The current implementation loads all batches into memory before processing them. While the comment suggests an expected capacity of 100, this could be problematic for larger datasets.

Consider processing batches in chunks to manage memory more efficiently:

 func migrateOutgoingTxBatchBlockKey(ctx sdk.Context, storeKey storetypes.StoreKey, cdc codec.BinaryCodec) {
 	kvStore := ctx.KVStore(storeKey)
 	iter := storetypes.KVStorePrefixIterator(kvStore, types.OutgoingTxBatchBlockKey)
 	defer iter.Close()
 
-	batches := make([]*types.OutgoingTxBatch, 0, 100)
 	for ; iter.Valid(); iter.Next() {
 		batch := new(types.OutgoingTxBatch)
 		cdc.MustUnmarshal(iter.Value(), batch)
-		batches = append(batches, batch)
+		newBlockKey := types.GetOutgoingTxBatchBlockKey(batch.Block, batch.BatchNonce)
+		kvStore.Set(newBlockKey, cdc.MustMarshal(batch))
 		kvStore.Delete(iter.Key())
 	}
-
-	for _, batch := range batches {
-		newBlockKey := types.GetOutgoingTxBatchBlockKey(batch.Block, batch.BatchNonce)
-		kvStore.Set(newBlockKey, cdc.MustMarshal(batch))
-	}
 }

This approach:

  1. Processes each batch immediately
  2. Reduces memory usage
  3. Maintains the same functionality
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0fb5334 and 6016568.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • telemetry/metrics.go (0 hunks)
  • testutil/helpers/key.go (0 hunks)
  • x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_v1_test.go (0 hunks)
  • x/crosschain/migrations/v8/migrate.go (1 hunks)
  • x/crosschain/mock/expected_keepers_mocks.go (0 hunks)
  • x/crosschain/types/expected_keepers.go (0 hunks)
  • x/crosschain/types/key.go (0 hunks)
  • x/crosschain/types/target.go (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
  • telemetry/metrics.go
  • testutil/helpers/key.go
  • x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_v1_test.go
  • x/crosschain/mock/expected_keepers_mocks.go
  • x/crosschain/types/expected_keepers.go
  • x/crosschain/types/key.go
  • x/crosschain/types/target.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
x/crosschain/migrations/v8/migrate.go (2)

Line range hint 39-43: Consider adding migration safety checks.

The current migration process lacks validation steps that could prevent data loss in case of interruption or errors.

Consider adding the following safety measures:

  1. Validate the new key format before deleting old keys
  2. Add a migration status tracker
  3. Implement rollback capability

Would you like me to provide a detailed implementation of these safety measures?


13-14: Verify the necessity of adding a new deprecated variable.

Adding a new variable that's immediately marked as deprecated seems counterintuitive, especially since it's not used in the migration functions. Additionally, the AI summary indicates this key is removed in x/crosschain/types/key.go.

Let's verify the usage and necessity of this key:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about this migration and the key's usage.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

The deprecated variable declaration is part of a proper migration strategy

The git history and specification documentation reveal that OutgoingTxPoolKey was previously an active part of the system (as shown in types/key.go removal diff) and was used for indexing outgoing transaction pools. The key's presence in the migration file serves two purposes:

  1. Documentation of the historical key value (0x18) for future reference
  2. Maintaining the constant during the migration process, even though it's marked as deprecated

Unlike other removed keys that are included in GetRemovedStoreKeys(), this key is not actively removed during migration, suggesting it might be handled differently or in a subsequent upgrade.

This is a common practice in migration files to document the deprecation process while ensuring a smooth transition.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if OutgoingTxPoolKey is used elsewhere in the codebase

# Test 1: Search for direct references to OutgoingTxPoolKey
echo "Searching for OutgoingTxPoolKey usage..."
rg -l "OutgoingTxPoolKey"

# Test 2: Search for the specific byte value to catch any hardcoded usage
echo "Searching for potential hardcoded byte value..."
rg -l "\x18"

Length of output: 304


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the spec file to understand the key's purpose
echo "=== Checking specification documentation ==="
cat x/crosschain/spec/02_state.md

# Check the migration file content
echo -e "\n=== Checking migration file content ==="
cat x/crosschain/migrations/v8/migrate.go

# Look for historical usage of this key in git history
echo -e "\n=== Checking git history for this key ==="
git log -p | grep -A 5 -B 5 "OutgoingTxPoolKey"

# Check for any store operations using byte value 0x18
echo -e "\n=== Checking for store operations with this key ==="
rg "store.*0x18" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 11391

@fx0x55 fx0x55 merged commit bfb4a1a into main Oct 24, 2024
11 checks passed
@fx0x55 fx0x55 deleted the fx0x55/remove-unused branch October 24, 2024 03:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants