Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(solidity): add interface to query maxQuoteIndex #795

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

zakir-code
Copy link
Contributor

@zakir-code zakir-code commented Oct 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new method maxQuoteIndex to retrieve the maximum quote index, enhancing the functionality of the bridge fee management.
    • Updated the interface to include the new maxQuoteIndex function, providing a clearer API for users interacting with bridge fees.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new method MaxQuoteIndex to the IBridgeFeeQuote contract, allowing retrieval of the maximum quote index as a uint256. This method is implemented in three contexts: IBridgeFeeQuoteCaller, IBridgeFeeQuoteSession, and IBridgeFeeQuoteCallerSession. Additionally, the IBridgeFeeQuoteMetaData structure is updated to include the ABI for the new function. Correspondingly, the IBridgeFeeQuote interface in the Solidity file has been modified to declare the maxQuoteIndex function as an external view function.

Changes

File Change Summary
contract/ibridge_fee_quote.sol.go Added MaxQuoteIndex method in IBridgeFeeQuoteCaller, IBridgeFeeQuoteSession, and IBridgeFeeQuoteCallerSession. Updated IBridgeFeeQuoteMetaData to include ABI for maxQuoteIndex.
solidity/contracts/bridge/IBridgeFee.sol Added maxQuoteIndex function declaration in IBridgeFeeQuote interface as an external view function returning uint256.

Possibly related PRs

🐇 In the meadow, where quotes bloom,
A new index rises, dispelling the gloom.
With MaxQuoteIndex, we leap with delight,
Fetching the max, our future is bright!
Hops of joy in the code we weave,
In the world of bridges, we believe! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
solidity/contracts/bridge/IBridgeFee.sol (1)

57-58: Add NatSpec documentation for the new function.

The function addition looks good and serves a clear purpose. However, consider adding NatSpec documentation to explain the function's purpose and return value.

+    /// @notice Returns the maximum quote index that can be used in quote-related functions
+    /// @return The highest valid quote index
     function maxQuoteIndex() external view returns (uint256);
contract/ibridge_fee_quote.sol.go (1)

336-365: Add descriptive documentation for the MaxQuoteIndex method.

While the implementation is correct, consider adding a description of the method's purpose and return value in the comments, similar to other methods in the contract. This would help users understand what the maximum quote index represents and how it should be used.

Add documentation like this:

 // MaxQuoteIndex is a free data retrieval call binding the contract method 0xec5af586.
 //
+// Returns the maximum quote index that has been used so far. This can be used to
+// determine the valid range for quote lookups and to track the total number of quotes.
+//
 // Solidity: function maxQuoteIndex() view returns(uint256)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2e8338 and 0432aad.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • contract/ibridge_fee_quote.sol.go (2 hunks)
  • solidity/contracts/bridge/IBridgeFee.sol (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
solidity/contracts/bridge/IBridgeFee.sol (1)

58-58: Verify integration with quote functions.

The new function complements the existing quote functionality, particularly getQuote() which accepts a quote index parameter. Let's verify that other functions using quote indices are properly bounded by this value.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

Proper bounds checking for quoteIndex is implemented

The codebase shows that quoteIndex bounds checking is properly implemented in the BridgeFeeQuote contract. Specifically:

  • The quote function validates that _input.quoteIndex < maxQuoteIndex before processing
  • The getQuote function uses the index as part of the asset key for quote retrieval
  • All quote-related functions maintain consistency with this boundary
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for functions that use quoteIndex to ensure proper bounds checking

# Test: Look for quoteIndex usage in related contracts
rg -t sol "quoteIndex" ./solidity/contracts/

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for quoteIndex usage without file type restriction
rg "quoteIndex" ./solidity/contracts/ -A 3 -B 3

Length of output: 1647


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for getQuote function implementation and its usage
rg "getQuote" ./solidity/contracts/ -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 5081


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the implementation of getQuote to see the bounds checking
rg -A 15 "function getQuote\(" ./solidity/contracts/bridge/BridgeFeeQuote.sol

Length of output: 671

contract/ibridge_fee_quote.sol.go (2)

63-63: LGTM! ABI updated correctly for the new method.

The ABI has been properly extended to include the new maxQuoteIndex method with appropriate view modifier and return type.


336-351: Verify integration with GetQuote functionality.

The new MaxQuoteIndex method appears to be related to the GetQuote function which accepts an index parameter. Let's verify that these functions work together as expected.

✅ Verification successful

Integration between MaxQuoteIndex and GetQuote is properly implemented

Based on the code analysis, the integration between MaxQuoteIndex and GetQuote is correctly implemented in the smart contract:

  • maxQuoteIndex is used as a boundary check in the quote creation process:
if (_input.quoteIndex >= maxQuoteIndex) {
    revert QuoteIndexInvalid();
}
  • It's also used to size quote arrays in related functions:
QuoteInfo[] memory quotesList = new QuoteInfo[](maxQuoteIndex);
for (uint256 i = 0; i < maxQuoteIndex; i++) {
    // ... quote processing ...
}

The Go bindings correctly expose this functionality, allowing callers to verify quote indices are within bounds before making quote-related calls.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if GetQuote's index parameter is validated against MaxQuoteIndex
# Look for bounds checking in the implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function getQuote($_, $_, $_, uint256 $_index) {
  $$$
  require($_index $_ maxQuoteIndex(), $_);
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 128


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find the GetQuote implementation and understand its relationship with maxQuoteIndex
rg -A 10 "function getQuote" --type solidity

# Also search for any usage patterns of maxQuoteIndex
rg "maxQuoteIndex" --type solidity

Length of output: 147


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the GetQuote implementation and maxQuoteIndex usage without file type filtering
rg -A 10 "function getQuote"

# Also search for any usage patterns of maxQuoteIndex
rg "maxQuoteIndex" -A 3

Length of output: 25029

@zakir-code zakir-code merged commit 79ad4c0 into main Oct 30, 2024
10 checks passed
@zakir-code zakir-code deleted the todd/interface branch October 30, 2024 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants