-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improved code quality checks #2
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve extensive modifications across various files, primarily focusing on updating method signatures to use the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
server/interface.go (1)
10-12
: Consider updating the comment to match parameter order.The comment above the Start method could be more specific about the parameter order.
- // Start service and keep the goroutine of the blocked + // Start service with the given context and error group, keeping the goroutine blockedtool/json.go (1)
5-18
: Consider more idiomatic function names.The prefix "Itf" in the function names is not a standard Go abbreviation. Consider renaming these functions to be more idiomatic:
MustItfToJSONStr
→MustToJSONStr
MustItfToJSONStrIndex
→MustToJSONStrIndent
This would make the code more aligned with typical Go naming conventions while maintaining clarity about the functions' purposes.
pprof/server_test.go (1)
33-34
: LGTM! Consider adding a cleanup commentGood use of require for cleanup errors as failed server cleanup could affect subsequent tests.
Consider adding a comment explaining the importance of cleanup validation:
<-ctx.Done() + // Ensure proper server cleanup to prevent interference with other tests require.NoError(t, server.Close()) require.NoError(t, group.Wait())
eth/keys.go (1)
14-14
: LGTM, but consider splitting the function for better clarity.While the linter directive is appropriate here, the boolean flag parameter could be eliminated by splitting this into two focused functions:
NewPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile string) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error)
NewPrivKeyFromKeyStoreWithPassword(keystoreFile, passwordFile string) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error)
This would make the API more explicit and eliminate the need for the flag parameter.
-func NewPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile, passwordFile string, needPass bool) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error) { //nolint:revive // flag-parameter +func NewPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile string) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error) { + return newPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile, "", false) +} + +func NewPrivKeyFromKeyStoreWithPassword(keystoreFile, passwordFile string) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error) { + return newPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile, passwordFile, true) +} + +func newPrivKeyFromKeyStore(keystoreFile, passwordFile string, needPass bool) (*ecdsa.PrivateKey, error) {telemetry/server_test.go (1)
28-28
: Consider standardizing assertion style across the test.While changing to
require.NoError
here is good, there are stillassert.NoError
calls at the end of the test. For consistency, consider using the same assertion style throughout the test.Apply this diff to standardize the assertions:
<-ctx.Done() - assert.NoError(t, server.Close()) - assert.NoError(t, group.Wait()) + require.NoError(t, server.Close()) + require.NoError(t, group.Wait())log/zerolog_test.go (2)
30-30
: LGTM: Consistent error handling improvement across test functionsThe consistent replacement of
assert.NoError
withrequire.NoError
across all test functions improves the robustness of the test suite by ensuring immediate test failure on logger initialization errors.Consider applying this same pattern to other test files in the codebase for consistency. This change aligns with Go testing best practices where setup failures should immediately fail tests rather than continue with invalid state.
Also applies to: 39-39, 48-48
Update error assertions in logger tests for consistency
The verification reveals two distinct patterns of
assert.NoError
usage that need different handling:
In
log/zaplog_test.go
, the logger initialization error checks should be updated torequire.NoError
for consistency with the changes made inzerolog_test.go
, as these are critical setup steps.The remaining
assert.NoError
usages are appropriate in their current form:
- In
telemetry/server_test.go
they're used for cleanup operations- In test tables of
scheduler_test.go
,driver_test.go
,mysql_test.go
, andsqlite_test.go
they're used as test expectations viawantErr
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-56
: Verify consistent error handling across the codebaseLet's ensure this error handling pattern is being applied consistently across all test files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining assert.NoError usage in test files # that might need to be updated to require.NoError # Search for remaining assert.NoError usage in test files echo "Checking for remaining assert.NoError usage in test files:" rg "assert\.NoError" --type go --type-add 'go:*.go' -g '*_test.go' # Search for mixed usage of assert.NoError and require.NoError in same files echo -e "\nChecking for files with mixed usage of assert.NoError and require.NoError:" rg -l "assert\.NoError.*require\.NoError|require\.NoError.*assert\.NoError" --type go --type-add 'go:*.go' -g '*_test.go'Length of output: 1115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the context of assert.NoError usage to understand if they need to be changed to require.NoError # Check telemetry/server_test.go echo "=== telemetry/server_test.go ===" rg "assert\.NoError" telemetry/server_test.go -B 2 -A 2 # Check log/zaplog_test.go echo -e "\n=== log/zaplog_test.go ===" rg "assert\.NoError" log/zaplog_test.go -B 2 -A 2 # Check scheduler and db test files for wantErr context echo -e "\n=== scheduler and db test files ===" rg "wantErr:\s*assert\.NoError" -B 5 -A 2 scheduler/scheduler_test.go db/driver_test.go db/mysql_test.go db/sqlite_test.goLength of output: 3354
tool/mapstructure.go (1)
Line range hint
53-68
: Simplify error handling in decimal conversionWhile the type change to
any
is good, there's a minor improvement possible in the error handling.Consider this small refinement:
dec, err := decimal.NewFromString(data.(string)) if err != nil { return nil, errors.Wrapf(err, "can't convert %v to decimal.Decimal", data) } - return dec, err + return dec, nilThe current code returns
err
which was already checked and would always be nil at this point.db/config_test.go (1)
32-32
: Great improvement in test error handling!Switching to
suite.Require().NoError()
is a better practice as it ensures immediate test failure on error, preventing subsequent assertions from executing with an invalid configuration state. This makes test failures more obvious and easier to debug.Consider applying the same improvement to the table-driven test
TestSourceDesensitization
by usingrequire.Equal()
instead of the currentt.Errorf()
pattern for consistency across the test suite.db/sqlite_test.go (2)
60-60
: Consider using more specific error assertionsInstead of just checking if the error is not nil, it would be more robust to verify the expected error condition.
-suite.NotNil(suite.driver.Open("coastdao.db")) +err := suite.driver.Open("coastdao.db") +suite.Error(err, "should return error when database doesn't exist")
60-81
: Consider structuring error test cases more systematicallyWhile the changes to standardize assertions are good, consider enhancing the error testing strategy by:
- Using table-driven tests for Open/CreateDB error cases (like you did for CheckSource)
- Testing specific error conditions rather than just error presence
- Adding test cases for edge cases (invalid paths, permission issues, etc.)
telemetry/config.go (1)
75-77
: LGTM! Consider similar improvements for other methods.The removal of the unused receiver parameter name improves code clarity. This change aligns with Go's style guide which suggests omitting parameter names when they're not used in the method body.
Consider reviewing other methods in the codebase for similar opportunities where receiver names are unused. For example, you can use this script to find potential candidates:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find method receivers that might have unused names # Note: This is a basic check and results need manual verification # Search for method receivers with single-letter names that might be unused rg -U 'func \([a-z] [^)]+\).*?\{(?:\s*return[^}]+\}|\s*[^a-z][^}]*\})' --type godb/sqlite.go (2)
Line range hint
32-37
: LGTM! Value receiver is appropriate hereThe change from pointer to value receiver is correct since this method doesn't modify the receiver's state. This aligns with Go best practices where methods that don't need to modify their receiver should use value receivers.
79-81
: LGTM! Consider making this a package-level variableThe value receiver is appropriate as this method is stateless. However, since it returns a constant empty map, consider defining it as a package-level variable to avoid repeated map allocations.
+var sqliteMigrateOptions = map[string]string{} + func (*Sqlite) MigrateOptions() map[string]string { - return map[string]string{} + return sqliteMigrateOptions }rand/random_test.go (1)
71-71
: Consider keeping the parameter name for consistencyWhile removing the parameter name works functionally, it creates inconsistency with other test functions in the file that use named parameters. Consider keeping the
t
parameter name:-func TestRngConcurrencySafety(*testing.T) { +func TestRngConcurrencySafety(t *testing.T) {telemetry/metrics.go (1)
63-63
: LGTM! Consider adding a comment about the unused receiver.The change from pointer receiver to unnamed receiver is appropriate since the method doesn't use any Server state. This makes the code's intent clearer.
Consider adding a comment to explain why the receiver is unused:
+// gatherPrometheus uses the global prometheus.DefaultGatherer and doesn't need Server state func (*Server) gatherPrometheus() (GatherResponse, error) {
.golangci.yml (1)
101-101
: Add newline at end of fileAdd a newline character at the end of the file to comply with POSIX standards.
- name: cognitive-complexity disabled: true +
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 101-101: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
log/zerolog.go (1)
33-38
: LGTM! Good separation of concerns.The refactoring improves code organization by separating the public interface from implementation details. The error handling and format validation are comprehensive.
Consider using a custom error type or constants for the format validation error to make error handling more idiomatic:
+const ErrInvalidLogFormat = "invalid log format" func newZeroLog(format, logLevel string) (*zerolog.Logger, error) { // ... default: - return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid log format: %s", format) + return nil, fmt.Errorf("%s: %s", ErrInvalidLogFormat, format) } // ... }Also applies to: 85-104
dao/base.go (1)
Line range hint
91-97
: LGTM! Consistent with CommitTx changes.The receiver type change is appropriate and maintains consistency with the CommitTx method. Both transaction management methods now clearly indicate they operate solely on the context.
The transaction handling pattern using context values is a clean approach, but consider documenting the expected lifecycle of transactions (Begin->Commit/Rollback) in the package documentation to help other developers use it correctly.
db/mysql.go (1)
Line range hint
129-134
: LGTM! Consider further optimizationThe change from pointer receiver to value receiver is correct since this method returns static data. However, since the returned map is constant, consider declaring it as a package-level constant to avoid recreating it on every call.
+var mysqlMigrateOptions = map[string]string{ + "gorm:table_options": "ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4", +} + func (*Mysql) MigrateOptions() map[string]string { - return map[string]string{ - "gorm:table_options": "ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4", - } + return mysqlMigrateOptions }db/db_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-158
: Great improvement in test architectureThe systematic conversion to
suite.Require()
throughout the test suite is a valuable architectural improvement because:
- It ensures immediate test failure on critical checks
- It maintains consistent error handling patterns
- It makes test failures more obvious and easier to debug
Consider adding these testing guidelines to your team's coding standards document.
db/config.go (1)
71-71
: Consider future refactoring to reduce complexity.While the linter directive addresses the immediate warning, the high cyclomatic complexity suggests this method could benefit from refactoring. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused methods in a future PR.
Example approach for future consideration:
func (c Config) Check() error { checks := []func() error{ c.validateDriver, c.validateConnTimes, c.validateConnCounts, c.validateLogLevel, } for _, check := range checks { if err := check(); err != nil { return err } } return nil }telemetry/server.go (1)
Line range hint
47-134
: Consider breaking down the Start method for better maintainability.The
//nolint:revive // cyclomatic
comment suggests high cyclomatic complexity. Consider breaking down theStart
method into smaller, focused functions:
initializeMetrics
setupPrometheusServer
startMetricsCollection
This would improve readability and make the code easier to test and maintain.
Example refactor:
func (s *Server) initializeMetrics() error { if numGlobalLables := len(s.config.GlobalLabels); numGlobalLables > 0 { parsedGlobalLabels := make([]metrics.Label, numGlobalLables) for i, gl := range s.config.GlobalLabels { parsedGlobalLabels[i] = NewLabel(gl[0], gl[1]) } globalLabels = parsedGlobalLabels } s.memSink = metrics.NewInmemSink(10*time.Second, time.Minute) // ... rest of metrics initialization return nil } func (s *Server) setupPrometheusServer(ctx context.Context) error { s.prometheus = &http.Server{ Addr: s.config.ListenAddr, ReadHeaderTimeout: s.config.ReadTimeout, Handler: promhttp.InstrumentMetricHandler( prometheus.DefaultRegisterer, promhttp.HandlerFor( prometheus.DefaultGatherer, promhttp.HandlerOpts{MaxRequestsInFlight: s.config.MaxOpenConnections}, ), ), BaseContext: func(net.Listener) context.Context { return ctx }, } return nil } func (s *Server) startMetricsCollection(group *errgroup.Group) { if len(s.metricsCollector) == 0 { return } group.Go(func() error { defer func() { if err := recover(); err != nil { s.logger.Error("metric collection failed to enable", "error", err, "stack", debug.Stack()) } }() // ... rest of metrics collection return nil }) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (38)
.golangci.yml
(3 hunks)dao/base.go
(1 hunks)dao/base_test.go
(2 hunks)db/config.go
(2 hunks)db/config_test.go
(1 hunks)db/db.go
(10 hunks)db/db_test.go
(3 hunks)db/driver_test.go
(1 hunks)db/mysql.go
(2 hunks)db/sqlite.go
(2 hunks)db/sqlite_test.go
(1 hunks)eth/config_test.go
(1 hunks)eth/keys.go
(1 hunks)eth/rpc.go
(1 hunks)log/log.go
(1 hunks)log/logger.go
(1 hunks)log/noplog.go
(1 hunks)log/zaplog.go
(1 hunks)log/zerolog.go
(2 hunks)log/zerolog_test.go
(5 hunks)migration/config.go
(1 hunks)migration/migration.go
(2 hunks)modules/big_int.go
(2 hunks)pprof/config.go
(1 hunks)pprof/server.go
(3 hunks)pprof/server_test.go
(2 hunks)rand/random.go
(1 hunks)rand/random_test.go
(2 hunks)scheduler/scheduler.go
(1 hunks)scheduler/scheduler_test.go
(2 hunks)server/interface.go
(1 hunks)telemetry/config.go
(1 hunks)telemetry/metrics.go
(1 hunks)telemetry/server.go
(2 hunks)telemetry/server_test.go
(1 hunks)tool/file.go
(1 hunks)tool/json.go
(1 hunks)tool/mapstructure.go
(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- eth/rpc.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.golangci.yml
[error] 101-101: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (68)
tool/json.go (2)
5-10
: LGTM! Good improvements to naming and type usage.
The changes improve the code by:
- Using the more modern
any
type instead ofinterface{}
- Following proper Go naming conventions with "JSON" capitalization
- Simplifying the control flow while maintaining the same behavior
13-18
: LGTM! Consistent improvements with the previous function.
The changes maintain consistency with the previous function while preserving the distinct indentation functionality.
migration/config.go (2)
29-31
: LGTM! Good cleanup of unused receiver name.
The removal of the unused receiver name c
improves code clarity while maintaining identical functionality.
33-35
: LGTM! Good cleanup of unused receiver name.
The removal of the unused receiver name c
improves code clarity while maintaining identical functionality.
tool/file.go (2)
10-10
: LGTM! Good modernization of type syntax
The change from interface{}
to any
aligns with modern Go practices and improves code readability while maintaining identical functionality.
10-10
: Verify consistent usage of any
type
Let's ensure this type modernization is consistently applied across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have failed due to syntax issues. Let's try a different approach to gather information about both interface{}
and any
usage in the codebase to verify consistency.
Type modernization is consistently applied
The codebase shows consistent usage of any
type in function signatures and interfaces. The search results reveal:
-
All modern Go interfaces and functions use
any
type appropriately, particularly in:- Database operations (db/db.go)
- Logging interfaces (log/log.go)
- JSON handling (tool/file.go)
- Type conversion utilities (tool/mapstructure.go)
-
The occurrences of
interface{}
are only found in proper interface definitions (liketype Server interface
,type Logger interface
, etc.) where they define method contracts, not as type parameters.
The change in LoadJSONFile
to use any
aligns with the modern Go practices seen throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining interface{} usage that might need updating
# Expected: No occurrences of interface{} in function signatures that could use 'any' instead
# Search for interface{} usage in Go files
rg 'interface\{\}' -t go
# Search for function signatures using interface{} specifically
ast-grep --pattern 'func $NAME($PARAMS interface{}) $RETURN'
Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for interface{} usage
# Search for interface{} in Go files with surrounding context
rg -t go 'interface\{\}' -B 2 -A 2
# Also search for any type declarations to see the broader context
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ interface {
$$$
}'
# Search for function parameters using any
rg -t go '\bany\b' -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 19825
eth/config_test.go (1)
24-24
: LGTM! Good improvement in test assertions.
The change from suite.EqualError
to suite.Require().EqualError
is a positive improvement that provides stricter error handling. Using Require()
ensures tests fail fast when assertions don't pass, making test failures more obvious and preventing cascading failures.
Also applies to: 28-28
log/noplog.go (3)
11-13
: LGTM! Clean type update to any
The change from interface{}
to any
is appropriate, and the named receiver is correctly maintained as it's used in the return statement.
15-23
: LGTM! Consistent improvements across logging methods
The changes improve the code by:
- Using modern
any
type instead ofinterface{}
- Removing unused named receivers
- Maintaining consistent formatting across all methods
25-33
: LGTM! Consistent formatting method improvements
The changes maintain perfect symmetry with the standard logging methods, ensuring a consistent approach across the entire logger implementation.
db/driver_test.go (1)
11-11
: LGTM! More idiomatic assertion.
The change to use assert.Len
improves readability by using a more specific and descriptive assertion method for checking collection length.
pprof/config.go (1)
40-42
: LGTM! Good style improvement.
The change to use an unnamed receiver is appropriate since the receiver variable isn't used in the method body. This follows Go best practices for method declarations.
log/logger.go (2)
20-20
: LGTM! Good modernization of type signatures
The change from interface{}
to any
aligns with modern Go practices and improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.
Also applies to: 28-28, 36-36, 44-44
24-24
: LGTM! Verify consistency across related files
The type signature updates look good. Let's ensure this change is consistently applied across related files.
Also applies to: 32-32, 40-40, 48-48
✅ Verification successful
Let me fix the regex and try again to verify this properly.
Let me check the logger interface to ensure completeness of the changes.
Changes are consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- All logging methods in
logger.go
use...any
consistently - The
Logger
interface inlog.go
also uses...any
for all its method signatures - No instances of
...interface{}
were found in logging-related files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining interface{} usage in logging-related files
# that should have been updated to 'any'
# Search for interface{} usage in logging-related files
echo "Checking for remaining interface{} usage in logging files..."
rg "interface{}" --type go -l | grep -i "log"
# Search for method signatures similar to our logging methods
echo "Checking for similar logging method signatures..."
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_(msg string, args ...interface{}) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 463
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for interface{} usage in logging-related files
echo "Checking for remaining interface{} usage in logging files..."
rg "interface\{\}" --type go | grep -i "log"
# Search for similar logging method signatures
echo "Checking for similar method signatures..."
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($_, args ...interface{}) {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any usage with 'any'
echo "Checking current any usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_($_, args ...any) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1413
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the logger interface definition
echo "Checking logger interface definition..."
rg "type.*Logger.*interface" -A 10 --type go
# Also check any other files that might contain logging-related interfaces
echo "Checking other logging-related interfaces..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface {
$_($_, ...interface{})
$$$
}'
Length of output: 701
pprof/server_test.go (3)
10-10
: LGTM! Good addition of require package
The addition of the require package while maintaining assert is appropriate, as they serve different purposes in the test.
29-31
: LGTM! Proper error handling hierarchy
Good use of require for critical errors while maintaining assert for subsequent checks. This ensures the test fails fast on critical errors while still performing validation checks when appropriate.
25-26
: LGTM! Parameter order follows Go conventions
The parameter order change (ctx first) aligns with Go's standard conventions for context usage.
✅ Verification successful
These commands will help us:
- Find all Start method signatures to verify parameter ordering
- Find all Start method calls to ensure they match the new convention
Parameter ordering is consistently implemented across the codebase
The verification confirms that all Start
method implementations and calls follow the same parameter ordering with context.Context
as the first parameter:
- Method signatures in:
telemetry/server.go
:Start(ctx context.Context, group *errgroup.Group)
migration/migration.go
:Start(context.Context, *errgroup.Group)
pprof/server.go
:Start(ctx context.Context, group *errgroup.Group)
- Method calls in:
telemetry/server_test.go
:Start(ctx, group)
pprof/server_test.go
:Start(ctx, group)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify consistent parameter ordering across Start method implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_ Start(ctx context.Context, group *errgroup.Group)'
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for Start method signatures
rg "func.*Start.*\(.*\)" -A 1
Length of output: 472
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also search for the actual method calls to verify consistency
rg "\.Start\(" -A 1
Length of output: 232
log/log.go (2)
24-24
: LGTM: Simplified variable declaration
The simplified declaration of NewLoggerFunc
improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality through type inference.
29-41
: LGTM: Updated type signatures to use any
The change from interface{}
to any
improves code readability and follows modern Go conventions.
Let's verify the minimum Go version requirement:
✅ Verification successful
✓ Go version requirement is compatible with any
type
The project requires Go 1.22 as specified in go.mod, which fully supports the any
type (introduced in Go 1.18). The change from interface{}
to any
is safe and follows modern Go conventions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the project's minimum Go version is compatible with the 'any' type (Go 1.18+)
# Look for go.mod file
if [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
echo "Checking Go version in go.mod:"
grep "^go " go.mod
else
echo "go.mod not found"
fi
# Check for any CI configuration files that might specify Go version
fd -e yml -e yaml | xargs grep -l "go-version" || true
Length of output: 173
modules/big_int.go (2)
13-13
: LGTM! Type change from interface{}
to any
improves readability.
The change maintains identical functionality while adopting modern Go type syntax.
43-43
: LGTM! Consistent type update to any
.
The change maintains the function's behavior while improving code consistency.
telemetry/server_test.go (1)
27-27
: LGTM! Parameter order follows Go conventions.
The updated parameter order for server.Start(ctx, group)
follows Go's convention of passing context as the first parameter, improving code consistency and readability.
log/zerolog_test.go (2)
8-8
: LGTM: Required import for stricter error handling
The addition of the require
package import is consistent with the transition to stricter error handling in tests.
18-18
: LGTM: Improved error handling in TestZeroLogger_Console
The switch to require.NoError
is an improvement as it prevents subsequent assertions from running if logger creation fails, which would be meaningless without a valid logger instance.
migration/migration.go (2)
32-32
: LGTM! Parameter reordering follows Go conventions.
The change to place context.Context
as the first parameter follows Go's best practices and improves consistency across the codebase.
64-64
: LGTM! Receiver naming follows Go style guide.
The change to use an anonymous receiver (*Server)
instead of (s *Server)
is correct since the receiver variable is unused in the method.
pprof/server.go (2)
8-8
: LGTM! Appropriate linter directive for debug tooling.
The added //nolint:gosec
directive with clear documentation is appropriate for the pprof import, as it's intentionally used for debugging purposes.
33-33
: LGTM! Improved parameter ordering follows Go conventions.
The change to make context.Context
the first parameter aligns with Go's standard conventions and improves consistency with the interface.
scheduler/scheduler.go (1)
42-42
: Consider the PR scope and variable declaration placement
This change appears to be more substantial than just formatting as indicated in the PR title. Moving the sleepTime
declaration outside the loop changes its scope and could affect memory usage (albeit minimally).
While the change is technically correct and matches the usage pattern in the code, it would be clearer if the PR title and description reflected these behavioral modifications.
Let's verify if there are similar patterns in other scheduler implementations:
Consider adding a comment explaining why sleepTime
is declared outside the loop, as it's used for dynamic sleep duration adjustments based on error conditions.
tool/mapstructure.go (2)
25-25
: LGTM: Type signature modernization
The change from interface{}
to any
aligns with modern Go practices while maintaining identical functionality.
41-41
: LGTM: Consistent type modernization
The change maintains consistency with the codebase-wide transition to any
type.
db/sqlite_test.go (2)
71-71
: LGTM!
The changes to use suite.Equal are appropriate, and the test cases effectively cover both simple and path-based database names.
Also applies to: 74-74
79-79
: LGTM!
The changes to use suite.Require().NoError are appropriate here, especially since these are critical operations that subsequent test steps depend on. Good use of T().TempDir() for test isolation.
Also applies to: 81-81
db/sqlite.go (5)
63-69
: LGTM! Appropriate use of value receiver
The method operates independently of the receiver's state, making a value receiver suitable here.
71-77
: LGTM! Value receiver is correct
The method performs stateless operations using only the input parameters, making a value receiver appropriate.
83-85
: LGTM! Appropriate use of value receiver
The method is a simple delegation to a package-level function, making a value receiver suitable.
Line range hint 87-97
: LGTM! Value receiver is appropriate
The method performs stateless operations with proper error handling, making a value receiver suitable.
Line range hint 32-97
: Verify the consistency of receiver types across the codebase
The changes consistently update receiver types from pointer to value receivers. Let's verify this pattern is applied consistently across related files.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that the pointer receivers found are all in test files (dao/base_test.go
) and are part of test suites that inherit from DaoTestSuite
. This is a common and correct pattern in Go testing where test suites typically use pointer receivers to maintain test state. Let's verify if there are any non-test files with pointer receivers that might need updates.
No inconsistencies found in receiver type usage
The verification confirms that:
- No pointer receivers exist in non-test files
- The only pointer receivers found are in test files, which is the correct pattern for test suites
The changes in sqlite.go
to use value receivers are consistent with the rest of the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining pointer receivers in related database drivers
# that might need similar updates for consistency.
# Search for pointer receiver methods in database-related files
echo "Checking for remaining pointer receivers in database files:"
ast-grep --pattern 'func (s *$_) $_($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 16005
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for pointer receivers in non-test files
echo "Checking for pointer receivers in non-test files:"
fd --type f --exclude '*_test.go' --extension go | xargs ast-grep --pattern 'func (s *$_) $_($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 219
rand/random_test.go (3)
17-17
: LGTM! More idiomatic assertion
The change to assert.Len
improves readability by using a more specific assertion method for length checking.
23-23
: LGTM! More idiomatic assertion
The change to assert.Len
improves readability by using a more specific assertion method for length checking.
30-30
: LGTM! More descriptive assertion
The change to assert.Less
improves test failure messages by clearly indicating the comparison that failed, rather than just showing a boolean condition.
.golangci.yml (4)
74-99
: Review revive rules configuration
The revive configuration looks good with sensible defaults:
- Disabled line length limits for flexibility
- Disabled function length checks
- Custom var naming rules for common acronyms
- Proper error handling configuration
5-5
: Verify test isolation before enabling parallel runners
Enabling parallel runners can improve performance but ensure that your tests are properly isolated and don't share mutable resources.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Parallel test execution appears safe to enable
The codebase shows good test isolation practices:
- Database tests use test suites with proper setup/teardown
- Shared variables are properly scoped within test functions
- Synchronization primitives (sync.WaitGroup) are used correctly for concurrent operations
- No global mutable state detected across test files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential test isolation issues
rg -g "**_test.go" -A 5 "var |global|sync\."
Length of output: 2850
3-3
:
Update Go version to currently available release
The specified Go version 1.22 is not yet released. Consider using 1.21 until 1.22 is officially available.
- go: '1.22'
+ go: '1.21'
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
10-36
: Consider potential linter conflicts
The enabled linters look good, but note that revive
and stylecheck
might have overlapping rules. This is not necessarily an issue but could lead to duplicate warnings.
log/zerolog.go (2)
Line range hint 18-24
: LGTM! Good use of underscore for unused parameter.
The change to use _
for the unused parameter follows Go best practices and makes the code intent clearer.
40-41
: LGTM! Good modernization of type signatures.
The consistent update from interface{}
to any
improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.
Let's verify the Go version requirement is properly set:
Also applies to: 45-46, 49-50, 53-54, 57-58, 61-62, 65-66, 69-70, 73-74, 77-78, 81-82
✅ Verification successful
Go version requirement is properly set for any
type usage
The codebase specifies Go 1.22 in go.mod, which fully supports the any
type alias (introduced in Go 1.18). The type signature modernization is safe to use.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if go.mod specifies Go 1.18+ which is required for `any`
# Check go.mod for Go version
if [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
echo "Checking Go version requirement..."
grep "^go 1." go.mod
else
echo "go.mod not found"
fi
Length of output: 129
dao/base.go (2)
83-89
: LGTM! Good improvement in receiver type.
The change from (d *BaseDao)
to (*BaseDao)
is appropriate since the method doesn't use the receiver. This makes the code more explicit about its dependencies and follows Go best practices.
Line range hint 83-97
: Verify transaction handling remains unchanged.
While the receiver changes are safe, let's verify there are no breaking changes to transaction handling in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have comprehensive evidence about transaction handling patterns and tests.
Transaction handling remains safe and well-tested
The verification shows:
- Transaction methods (BeginTx/CommitTx/RollbackTx) maintain their expected behavior
- Extensive test coverage exists including:
- Multiple transaction scenarios
- Nested transactions
- Error cases for already committed/rolled back transactions
- Transaction context handling
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any changes to transaction handling patterns
# Look for BeginTx/CommitTx/RollbackTx usage patterns
# Search for transaction method calls
echo "Checking transaction method usage patterns..."
rg -A 2 "BeginTx|CommitTx|RollbackTx" --type go
# Look for any tests involving transactions
echo "Checking transaction-related tests..."
rg -B 2 "func.*Test.*Transaction" --type go
Length of output: 4834
log/zaplog.go (3)
34-36
: LGTM! Good modernization of type signature.
The change from interface{}
to any
aligns with modern Go practices while maintaining the same functionality.
58-75
: LGTM! Correctly implemented formatted logging methods.
The formatted logging methods are properly implemented with:
- Modern
any
type usage - Correct argument spreading with
args...
34-75
: Verify Logger interface and implementations
Since these are interface method signature changes, we should verify:
- The Logger interface is updated to use
any
instead ofinterface{}
- All implementations of the Logger interface are updated accordingly
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the implementations to ensure they match the interface.
Logger interface and implementations are consistent
The verification confirms that:
- The Logger interface in
log/log.go
usesany
type consistently - All three implementations (ZapLogger, ZeroLogger, and nopLogger) correctly implement the interface with matching method signatures using
any
- All implementations are properly type-checked with
var _ Logger = (*Type)(nil)
assertions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Logger interface definition and implementations
echo "Checking Logger interface definition:"
rg "type Logger interface" -A 15
echo "\nChecking for Logger implementations:"
rg "var _ Logger = \(\*.*\)\(nil\)"
Length of output: 951
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check all logger implementations
echo "Checking ZeroLogger implementation:"
rg "func.*ZeroLogger" -A 1 log/zerolog.go
echo "\nChecking nopLogger implementation:"
rg "func.*nopLogger" -A 1 log/noplog.go
Length of output: 1979
db/mysql.go (2)
42-44
: LGTM! Appropriate receiver type change
The change from pointer receiver to value receiver is correct since this method doesn't modify any struct state and doesn't access any struct fields.
125-127
: LGTM! Appropriate receiver type change
The change from pointer receiver to value receiver is correct since this method is a stateless wrapper around the package-level GetMigrationsDriver function.
scheduler/scheduler_test.go (2)
36-38
: LGTM! Good style improvement.
Removing the unused parameter name ctx
follows Go's idiomatic practice of omitting parameter names when they're not referenced within the function body.
55-57
: LGTM! Maintains consistency.
The parameter name removal here maintains consistency with the earlier change, making the test cases uniform in style.
db/db_test.go (3)
26-26
: LGTM! Good improvement in test assertions
The conversion from assert
to suite.Require()
is a positive change as it ensures immediate test failure on critical checks. This makes the tests more robust and helps in faster debugging by failing fast when prerequisites aren't met.
Also applies to: 32-34, 39-40, 46-47, 54-55
72-72
: LGTM! Consistent improvement in transaction test assertions
The conversion to suite.Require()
is well implemented across all transaction test cases, maintaining the same logical flow while improving error handling.
Also applies to: 75-75, 78-78, 88-88, 91-91, 94-94, 107-110, 112-116, 118-118, 120-127
102-102
: Verify the impact of switching to suite.Run
The change from suite.T().Run
to suite.Run
might affect how test failures are reported. While both methods run subtests, they might handle test context differently.
✅ Verification successful
No impact from using suite.Run
- this is the correct usage
The codebase shows two distinct and correct usages of suite.Run
:
suite.Run(t, new(SuiteName))
- used to initialize test suitessuite.Run(name, func())
- used for subtests within test suites
The change to suite.Run
in the reviewed code follows the correct pattern for subtest execution within a test suite. This is consistent with the testify/suite package's intended usage and will properly handle test context and reporting.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of suite.T().Run vs suite.Run to ensure consistency
rg -l 'suite\.T\(\)\.Run|suite\.Run' --type go
Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage patterns in these files to understand the context
rg 'suite\.T\(\)\.Run|suite\.Run' --type go -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 1047
db/config.go (1)
Line range hint 58-63
: LGTM! Good modernization of type usage.
The change from interface{}
to any
aligns with modern Go practices while maintaining the same functionality. This type alias was introduced in Go 1.18 and makes the code more readable.
telemetry/server.go (2)
47-47
: LGTM! Parameter reordering follows Go conventions.
The reordering of parameters to have context.Context
as the first parameter follows Go's standard convention and improves consistency with other Start
methods in the codebase.
90-92
: LGTM! Simplified function signature.
The removal of the unused parameter name listener
follows Go's style of omitting parameter names when they're not referenced in the function body.
db/db.go (4)
21-49
: LGTM: Good modernization of type system usage
The change from interface{}
to any
aligns with modern Go practices. This is a type alias introduced in Go 1.18 that improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.
Line range hint 284-296
: LGTM: Robust error handling in database operations
The Create/Update/Updates implementations maintain good practices:
- Proper error handling with context in logs
- Validation of affected rows
- Clear error messages
Also applies to: 297-322
323-329
: LGTM: Clean Exec implementation
The Exec method follows consistent error handling patterns with proper logging of SQL and values.
Line range hint 331-341
: LGTM: Well-structured AutoMigrate implementation
The AutoMigrate implementation shows good practices:
- Transaction-wrapped migration
- Proper handling of driver-specific options
- Clear error wrapping
dao/base_test.go (2)
23-25
: LGTM: Appropriate receiver type change
The change from pointer to value receiver is appropriate since the method doesn't modify the receiver and only returns a constant string.
102-103
: LGTM: Enhanced error assertion
The change improves the test by:
- Using the more semantically correct
Error()
assertion - Adding explicit validation of the expected error message
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
db/mysql_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-38
: Consider enhancing test robustness.While the tests are functional, consider these improvements:
- Use
require
instead ofassert
to prevent test continuation after failures- Add specific error message assertions to validate exact error conditions
Here's a suggested improvement:
package db import ( "fmt" "testing" - "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" + "github.com/stretchr/testify/require" ) func TestMysql_CheckSource(t *testing.T) { tests := []struct { name string source string - wantErr assert.ErrorAssertionFunc + wantErr require.ErrorAssertionFunc + errMsg string }{ { name: "test1", source: "root:root@tcp(127.0.0.1:3306)/my?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local", - wantErr: assert.NoError, + wantErr: require.NoError, }, { name: "test2", source: "", - wantErr: assert.Error, + wantErr: require.Error, + errMsg: "empty source string", }, { name: "test3", source: "my", - wantErr: assert.Error, + wantErr: require.Error, + errMsg: "invalid source format", }, } for _, tt := range tests { t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { m := &Mysql{} - tt.wantErr(t, m.ParseSource(tt.source), fmt.Sprintf("ParseSource(%v)", tt.source)) + err := m.ParseSource(tt.source) + tt.wantErr(t, err, fmt.Sprintf("ParseSource(%v)", tt.source)) + if tt.errMsg != "" && err != nil { + require.Contains(t, err.Error(), tt.errMsg) + } }) } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.golangci.yml
(3 hunks)db/config.go
(3 hunks)db/config_test.go
(3 hunks)db/mysql_test.go
(2 hunks)db/sqlite_test.go
(3 hunks)pprof/server.go
(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- db/config.go
- db/config_test.go
- db/sqlite_test.go
- pprof/server.go
🔇 Additional comments (6)
db/mysql_test.go (1)
18-18
: LGTM! Database name changes maintain test coverage.
The changes from 'coastdao' to 'my' maintain the test's effectiveness in validating both valid and invalid connection strings.
Also applies to: 28-28
.golangci.yml (5)
10-36
: Well-chosen set of linters
The combination of linters is comprehensive and well-balanced, covering various aspects of code quality:
- Style and formatting (
gofumpt
,stylecheck
) - Performance (
prealloc
,wastedassign
) - Code complexity (
gocyclo
) - Testing (
testifylint
,thelper
) - Type safety (
errorlint
,typecheck
)
83-84
: LGTM: Cognitive complexity configuration fixed
The cognitive complexity rule is now properly configured, addressing the previous duplicate rule issue.
74-97
: Verify custom revive rules configuration
The revive configuration is comprehensive but needs verification:
- Disabling
line-length-limit
andfunction-length
might lead to maintainability issues - The var-naming allowlist includes common acronyms
- The unhandled error configuration only covers fmt.Print functions
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the code patterns.
Revive rules configuration is appropriate for the codebase
The current revive configuration aligns well with the codebase characteristics:
- Only 2 lines exceed 120 characters, with one being a log statement and another being a documented function
- No excessive function lengths detected in the codebase
- The var-naming allowlist covers standard acronyms (ID, URL, JSON, RPC) which is a common practice
- The unhandled error configuration for fmt.Print functions is sufficient as these are the primary sources of silent errors
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential issues with disabled length limits
# Check for very long lines
echo "Checking for long lines (>120 chars)..."
rg -t go "^.{120,}$"
# Check for long functions
echo "Checking for long functions..."
ast-grep --pattern $'func [^{]+ {
$$$
$$$
$$$
$$$
$$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 556
70-73
: Verify the impact of strict unused settings
The current unused settings are quite strict:
field-writes-are-uses: false
exported-fields-are-used: false
local-variables-are-used: false
This might lead to many false positives in the SDK where fields might be intentionally exported for user consumption.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage of these exported fields.
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:
Strict unused settings are appropriate for this codebase
The current unused settings in .golangci.yml
are well-suited for this codebase because:
- All exported fields are actively used across the codebase, particularly in configuration structs
- Fields are properly utilized in their respective packages (e.g., telemetry, db, eth)
- The strict settings help maintain code quality by preventing truly unused exports
The search results show proper usage patterns:
- Config fields are used for initialization and runtime behavior
- Fields are accessed in server implementations
- Database configurations properly utilize their exported fields
- RPC and telemetry configurations show active field usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential false positives with unused settings
# Check for exported fields that might be intentionally exposed
echo "Checking for exported fields..."
rg -t go "^[[:space:]]*[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*[[:space:]]*[a-zA-Z0-9]*[[:space:]]*\`.*\`" --glob "*.go" --glob "!*_test.go"
Length of output: 1880
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if these exported fields are actually used in the codebase
echo "Checking usage of config fields..."
rg -t go "config\.(ServiceName|Enabled|ListenAddr|MaxOpenConnections|Driver|Source|RpcUrl)" -B 1 -A 1
echo -e "\nChecking if fields are used in unmarshaling..."
rg -t go "(yaml|mapstructure).Unmarshal.*Config" -B 1 -A 1
Length of output: 5335
5-5
: Verify test safety with parallel runners
Enabling parallel runners can improve performance but may cause issues with tests that have side effects or share resources. Please ensure that all tests are designed to run safely in parallel.
✅ Verification successful
Parallel test execution appears safe
The codebase shows good test design practices for parallel execution:
- No global mutable state in test files
- Local test variables are properly scoped within test functions
- Database operations use isolated in-memory databases
- The only sync primitive usage (WaitGroup in random_test.go) is for proper test coordination
- No shared file system operations or resource conflicts detected
- Test variables are properly initialized within their test functions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential test parallelization issues
# Look for shared resources or global state in tests
# Search for test files with global variables
echo "Checking for global variables in tests..."
rg -t go "^var\s+\w+\s+" --glob "*_test.go"
# Search for file operations in tests (potential shared resource)
echo "Checking for file operations in tests..."
rg -t go "os\.(Open|Create|Remove|Mkdir|RemoveAll)" --glob "*_test.go"
# Search for database operations (potential shared resource)
echo "Checking for database operations in tests..."
rg -t go "(sql\.Open|database\.Open)" --glob "*_test.go"
Length of output: 460
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for test parallelization
# 1. Look for t.Parallel() usage which indicates tests designed for parallel execution
# 2. Look for shared test fixtures or setup
# 3. Look for global test variables with := syntax
echo "Checking for parallel test declarations..."
rg -t go "t\.Parallel\(\)" --glob "*_test.go"
echo "Checking for test fixtures and setup..."
rg -t go "(func TestMain|func Setup|BeforeEach)" --glob "*_test.go"
echo "Checking for global test variables (including :=)..."
rg -t go "^[[:space:]]*[[:alnum:]]+\s*:=\s*" --glob "*_test.go"
# Also check for sync primitives which might indicate thread-safe test design
echo "Checking for sync primitive usage in tests..."
rg -t go "sync\.(Mutex|RWMutex|Once|WaitGroup)" --glob "*_test.go"
Length of output: 4450
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
interface{}
withany
across multiple packages.Run
method of the scheduler for dynamic sleep time management.Tests
assert
torequire
for stricter error handling in test cases.Chores