Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security] Bump django from 2.1.2 to 2.2.11 #109

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dependabot-preview[bot]
Copy link

Bumps django from 2.1.2 to 2.2.11. This update includes security fixes.

Vulnerabilities fixed

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django An issue was discovered in Django 1.11.x before 1.11.23, 2.1.x before 2.1.11, and 2.2.x before 2.2.4. Due to the behaviour of the underlying HTMLParser, django.utils.html.strip_tags would be extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities.

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.11

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django An issue was discovered in Django 1.11.x before 1.11.23, 2.1.x before 2.1.11, and 2.2.x before 2.2.4. If passed certain inputs, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri could lead to significant memory usage due to a recursion when repercent-encoding invalid UTF-8 octet sequences.

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.11

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django An issue was discovered in Django 1.11.x before 1.11.23, 2.1.x before 2.1.11, and 2.2.x before 2.2.4. If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable.

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.11

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django An issue was discovered in Django 1.11.x before 1.11.23, 2.1.x before 2.1.11, and 2.2.x before 2.2.4. Due to an error in shallow key transformation, key and index lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.JSONField, and key lookups for django.contrib.postgres.fields.HStoreField, were subject to SQL injection. This could, for example, be exploited via crafted use of "OR 1=1" in a key or index name to return all records, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to the QuerySet.filter() function.

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.11

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.)

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.5

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.)

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.15

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django Django 1.11 before 1.11.28, 2.2 before 2.2.10, and 3.0 before 3.0.3 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a StringAgg delimiter (e.g., in Django applications that offer downloads of data as a series of rows with a user-specified column delimiter). By passing a suitably crafted delimiter to a contrib.postgres.aggregates.StringAgg instance, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL.

Affected versions: >= 2.0.0, < 2.2.10

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Potential account hijack via password reset form in Django Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. A suitably crafted email address (that is equal to an existing user's email address after case transformation of Unicode characters) would allow an attacker to be sent a password reset token for the matched user account. (One mitigation in the new releases is to send password reset tokens only to the registered user email address.)

Affected versions: >= 2.0.0, < 2.2.9

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

SQL injection in Django Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a tolerance parameter in GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle. By passing a suitably crafted tolerance to GIS functions and aggregates on Oracle, it was possible to break escaping and inject malicious SQL.

Affected versions: >= 2.0.0, < 2.2.11

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.21, 2.1 before 2.1.9, and 2.2 before 2.2.2. The clickable Current URL value displayed by the AdminURLFieldWidget displays the provided value without validating it as a safe URL. Thus, an unvalidated value stored in the database, or a value provided as a URL query parameter payload, could result in an clickable JavaScript link.

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.9

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django An issue was discovered in Django 1.11 before 1.11.22, 2.1 before 2.1.10, and 2.2 before 2.2.3. An HTTP request is not redirected to HTTPS when the SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER and SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT settings are used, and the proxy connects to Django via HTTPS. In other words, django.http.HttpRequest.scheme has incorrect behavior when a client uses HTTP.

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.10

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Low severity vulnerability that affects django In Django 1.11.x before 1.11.18, 2.0.x before 2.0.10, and 2.1.x before 2.1.5, an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component issue exists in django.views.defaults.page_not_found(), leading to content spoofing (in a 404 error page) if a user fails to recognize that a crafted URL has malicious content.

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.5

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Memory exhaustion in django.utils.numberformat.format() If django.utils.numberformat.format() -- used by contrib.admin as well as the the floatformat, filesizeformat, and intcomma templates filters -- received a Decimal with a large number of digits or a large exponent, it could lead to significant memory usage due to a call to '{:f}'.format().

Affected versions: >= 1.11.0, < 1.11.19; >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.11; >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.6

Sourced from The GitHub Security Advisory Database.

Moderate severity vulnerability that affects django Django 1.11.x before 1.11.19, 2.0.x before 2.0.11, and 2.1.x before 2.1.6 allows Uncontrolled Memory Consumption via a malicious attacker-supplied value to the django.utils.numberformat.format() function.

Affected versions: >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.6

Commits
  • 1676992 [2.2.x] Bumped version for 2.2.11 release.
  • fe886a3 [2.2.x] Fixed CVE-2020-9402 -- Properly escaped tolerance parameter in GIS fu...
  • 7deb87c [2.2.x] Fixed #31282 -- Corrected RelatedManager docs for using add/remove/se...
  • 32d89bf [2.2.x] Fixed #31246 -- Fixed locking models in QuerySet.select_for_update(of...
  • eeed073 [2.2.x] Added stub release notes for 2.2.11.
  • abb4829 [2.2.x] Added CVE-2020-7471 to security archive.
  • 2f663bf [2.2.x] Post-release version bump.
  • b2c33a5 [2.2.x] Bumped version for 2.2.10 release.
  • c67a368 [2.2.x] Fixed CVE-2020-7471 -- Properly escaped StringAgg(delimiter) parameter.
  • 96d6443 [2.2.x] Fixed timezones tests for PyYAML 5.3+.
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot badge me will comment on this PR with code to add a "Dependabot enabled" badge to your readme

Additionally, you can set the following in your Dependabot dashboard:

  • Update frequency (including time of day and day of week)
  • Pull request limits (per update run and/or open at any time)
  • Automerge options (never/patch/minor, and dev/runtime dependencies)
  • Out-of-range updates (receive only lockfile updates, if desired)
  • Security updates (receive only security updates, if desired)

Bumps [django](https://github.com/django/django) from 2.1.2 to 2.2.11. **This update includes security fixes.**
- [Release notes](https://github.com/django/django/releases)
- [Commits](django/django@2.1.2...2.2.11)

Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <support@dependabot.com>
@dependabot-preview dependabot-preview bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability labels Jun 5, 2020
@dependabot-preview
Copy link
Author

Superseded by #110.

@dependabot-preview dependabot-preview bot deleted the dependabot/pip/django-2.2.11 branch June 5, 2020 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants