Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cracked count on website #49

Open
xTYx728 opened this issue Feb 16, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Cracked count on website #49

xTYx728 opened this issue Feb 16, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@xTYx728
Copy link

xTYx728 commented Feb 16, 2019

Falls under enhancement not issue/bug.

Having a highscore tab on the website to show what user is cracking the most.
Would give incentive to people to run the cracker more or run custom dict's to see their name rise to the top

Just a suggestion, please close out if the team is fully against this. Thank you :)

@mrseeker
Copy link

I would add a "priority" list to this: The more work you submit, the more credits you get for a "priority" pass, where every credit will push one uncracked hash to the front of the queue. That is basically a win-win: The more submissions that yield a password, the more likely you will get rewarded with a fastpass.

@Banthex
Copy link

Banthex commented Aug 10, 2020

Currently, I'm working on this. I'm no software developer, so this takes its time. The help_crack.py is already working with a database. I try to create a leaderboard.
Have a look at http://banthex.de/ (project offline for improvements) for the high score. Not an official stanev site!

@nkvname
Copy link

nkvname commented Mar 7, 2021

Any hope this feature will be implemented?

@S0ly
Copy link

S0ly commented Aug 28, 2024

yeah would be nice to have an API key for your worker so you know your own stats etc

@RealEnder
Copy link
Owner

Have an idea how to approach this, but first think to add dynamic dicts, based on PROBEREQUEST frames.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants