Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TOK-517: pause builder reward claim #431

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

franciscotobar
Copy link
Contributor

@franciscotobar franciscotobar requested a review from a team November 28, 2024 02:27
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails

Scanned Files

const { getBuilderByAddress } = useBuilderContext()

const claimingBuilder = getBuilderByAddress(builder)
console.log('🚀 ~ useClaimBuilderReward ~ claimingBuilder:', claimingBuilder)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
console.log('🚀 ~ useClaimBuilderReward ~ claimingBuilder:', claimingBuilder)

Copy link
Contributor

@jurajpiar jurajpiar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

@franciscotobar franciscotobar force-pushed the TOK-517/paused-builders-rewards branch from 7e633be to f9f8078 Compare November 28, 2024 15:22
@antomor antomor changed the title refactor: pause builder reward claim TOK-517: pause builder reward claim Dec 3, 2024
@antomor antomor merged commit 731c6bf into develop Dec 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@antomor antomor deleted the TOK-517/paused-builders-rewards branch December 4, 2024 11:11
shenshin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
* refactor: pause builder reward claim

* refactor: pr comments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants