Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing "possible values" and sf.user.attributes for SCIM API #34

Closed
stecherb opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Missing "possible values" and sf.user.attributes for SCIM API #34

stecherb opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
contribution Valuable Contribution in-discussion This item is being discussed internally type/content-gaps Something essential is missing in the documentation.

Comments

@stecherb
Copy link

Issue description

Hi,

On the page: https://help.sap.com/docs/cloud-identity-services/cloud-identity-services/list-of-properties?locale=en-US filter = sf.user.attributes

are no "possible values" listed.

Also the entry references to OData API, what about the SCIM API?

Best regards

Feedback Type (Optional)

content gaps

Page Title on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

List of Properties

Page URL on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

https://help.sap.com/docs/cloud-identity-services/cloud-identity-services/list-of-properties?locale=en-US

@ValAta ValAta added contribution Valuable Contribution in-discussion This item is being discussed internally type/content-gaps Something essential is missing in the documentation. labels Jul 11, 2024
@IvelinaKiryakova
Copy link

Thank you for your feedback. The documentation for sf.user.filter property has been adjusted.
Note that when listing possible values, the Identity Provisioning documentation refers to the SAP SuccessFactors APIs documentation where all supported filtering attributes are described. In most cases we provide only examples. The full list is maintained by the corresponding SAP solution.

Best regards,
Ivelina

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution Valuable Contribution in-discussion This item is being discussed internally type/content-gaps Something essential is missing in the documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants