Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[doc issue] No description for disabled SOCKS proxyAuthorization. #6

Open
chezzet opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[doc issue] No description for disabled SOCKS proxyAuthorization. #6

chezzet opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Frank1Mueller
Labels
follow-up-with/dev Clarification with development needed. in-discussion This item is being discussed internally needs-more-info We need more info from the contributor to proceed type/content-gaps Something essential is missing in the documentation.

Comments

@chezzet
Copy link

chezzet commented Jun 7, 2024

Issue description

In case of proxyAuthorization disabled for tcp SOCKS port Connectivity Proxy returns no available auth method on JWT or No Authorization methods.
In that case should be used Username/Password authorization like for Neo environment but with a different username structurue (2.[cc_location_id]).
This is not covered by current Documentation.

Feedback Type (Optional)

content gaps

Page Title on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

Using the Connectivity Proxy

Page URL on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

https://help.sap.com/docs/connectivity/sap-btp-connectivity-cf/using-connectivity-proxy
@Frank1Mueller Frank1Mueller self-assigned this Jun 10, 2024
@Frank1Mueller Frank1Mueller added follow-up-with/dev Clarification with development needed. in-discussion This item is being discussed internally needs-more-info We need more info from the contributor to proceed type/content-gaps Something essential is missing in the documentation. labels Jun 10, 2024
@Frank1Mueller
Copy link
Contributor

Dear chezzet,

thanks a lot for pointing this out. We'll analyze the issue and get back to you soon.

Best regards
Frank

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Frank1Mueller Frank1Mueller

Labels
follow-up-with/dev Clarification with development needed. in-discussion This item is being discussed internally needs-more-info We need more info from the contributor to proceed type/content-gaps Something essential is missing in the documentation.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Frank1Mueller @chezzet