-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Default JSON-LD context #48
Comments
pietercolpaert
changed the title
Default JSON-LD context for a simple JSON-LD frame to be used by non Linked Data developers
Default JSON-LD context
Nov 16, 2023
I created a first proposal of a JSON-LD context and what a JSON document would look like then: The context{
"@context": {
"tree": "https://w3id.org/tree#",
"ldes": "https://w3id.org/ldes#",
"shape": { "@type":"@id", "@id":"tree:shape"},
"xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#",
"EventStream": "ldes:EventStream",
"node": {"@type": "@id", "@id": "tree:node"},
"members": {"@type": "@id", "@id": "tree:member"},
"relations": {"@id": "tree:relation"},
"view": {"@id": "tree:view"},
"path": {"@container": "@list", "@id": "tree:path", "@type": "@id"},
"value": {"@id":"tree:value"},
"timestampPath": {"@id":"ldes:timestampPath", "@type":"@id", "@container":"@list"},
"versionOfPath": {"@id":"ldes:versionOfPath", "@type":"@id", "@container":"@list"},
"retention": {"@id":"ldes:retentionPolicy"},
"amount": {"@id":"ldes:amount","@type":"xsd:integer"}
}
} An implementation{
"@context": [
{
"@base": "https://example.org/",
"ex": "https://example.org/",
"as": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#"
},
"https://w3id.org/ldes/context.jsonld"
],
"@id": "ex:MyEventStream",
"@type": "EventStream",
"shape": "ex:shaclShape",
"timestampPath": "as:published",
"members": [
{
"@id": "ex:Activity1",
"@type": "as:Create",
"as:published": "2023-11-30",
"as:object": "ex:S",
"@graph": {
"@id": "ex:S",
"ex:P": "O"
}
},
{
"@id": "ex:Activity2",
"@type": "as:Update",
"as:published": "2023-11-30",
"as:object": "ex:S",
"@graph": {
"@id": "ex:S",
"ex:P": "O2"
}
}
],
"view": {
"@id": "",
"@comment": "↑ this must be a URI to the current page (which is satisfied here through it being relative)",
"retention": {
"@type":"ldes:LatestVersionSubset",
"amount": "2",
"versionOfPath": "as:object"
},
"relations": [
{
"@type" : "tree:GreaterThanRelation",
"value": {
"@value": "2023-11-30",
"@type": "xsd:date"
},
"path": "as:published",
"node": "/Node2"
},
{
"@type" : "tree:LessThanRelation",
"value": {
"@value": "2023-12-30",
"@type": "xsd:date"
},
"path": "as:published",
"node": "/Node2"
}
]
}
} |
It seems that ABB has created a JSON-LD context: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
JSON-LD can lower the barrier for adoption of Linked Data when given clear rules on how to implement the JSON frame. @phochste proposed to have, in this repository, also a standard JSON-LD context that can be use for a default frame
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: