Replies: 6 comments 1 reply
-
That just looks like that's the way it was printed (note for instance that the lines of text are straight). If you did dewarp it, you would actually be warping it, which doesn't seem great in this specific example. So I'd just leave it as it is. Compare also with the Internet Archive's scan: https://archive.org/details/cinemaasgraphica00nils/page/32/mode/2up At any rate, this is in Spanish, and an older version, but it should give you an idea: https://youtu.be/pEocwJm7Hj0?t=84 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for your message. I'll have a look at the video, thanks. :) Sorry, perhaps that wasn't the best example. The diagram is supposed to be a film frame, so the top edge is definitely not warped like that on the printed page. It's just not an artifact of printing. Perhaps this is a better example from the same book: https://freeimage.host/i/tempimagejtemkh.HrXLUaj Again, red horizontal lines to show that the upper quarter of the page is warped, while the lower part of the page isn't. Another example, different book, this time worse, with both upper and lower parts of the page warped: https://freeimage.host/i/HrXQpfe These are scanning artifacts and, if possible, I'd like to get rid of them. Question is: can the dewarp function do this job? Automatic setting, or... ? thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Well, going off of my own experience (so make of it what you will): With the first image, I doubt dewarping it would greatly improve it. I'm pretty sure in that situation it's still the printing rather than the scan, it was typeset in the 1950s, when things weren't always perfectly straight, just good enough for the human eye on a printed page. If you've scanned this yourself and you can also try scanning a modern book using the same scanner, I'm sure you'll see this doesn't recur. But again, this is just my own experience. But, again, look at that and decide for yourself if that's enough of an improvement to be worth the trouble. Having done this with entire books in the past, I can tell you it gets old fast. Also, this concerns only ScanTailor Advance's dewarp function. I'm not sure, but I think more sophisticated modern solutions do exist, you'd just have to look for them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks much for your guidance on this. I agree that doing it manually for many pages in a book is probably too much work (which is one reason I'm trying scan tailor in the first place!), and the automatic dewarp you show looks like a definite improvement. So, I'll give it a go with automatic dewarp. I'm still struggling a bit with the various other options (e.g., content box is cropping the page too small in some cases), but I guess this is just the learning curve. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@mrobe say:
See also https://github.com/ImageProcessing-ElectronicPublications/photoquick filter "Deformation/Geometry/Un-tilt" witch option "Isometric". And see https://github.com/ImageProcessing-ElectronicPublications/yasw |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
On macOS, I'm having trouble making dewarp work in scan-tailor advanced.
Really basic stuff like what to click, the workflow, etc. is totally unobvious to me. The documentation isn't helpful.
For reference, I'm trying to fix pages that are warped like this: https://freeimage.host/i/HrWMTmP
I've drawn in some red lines so that the warping of the original scan is clear.
Is there a way to set up scan tailor to fix this?
By fiddling around, I can get a grid, but when I drag a corner, nothing happens.
In general, the app feels very slow, even on a dual-core i7. Granted, my input image files are very large, but I don't see any way to reduce their size before the output stage.
Any suggestions?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions