-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nextjs bug or weird behaviour: loaders require a sibling layout??? #346
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new layout pattern has been implemented across multiple dashboard routes in the web application. Three separate layout files have been added for different dashboard sections, each using an asynchronous Layout component that simply renders its child components. This appears to be a standardization of layout handling for different dashboard routes. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/app/(dashboard)/d/layout.tsx
(1 hunks)web/src/app/(dashboard)/l/layout.tsx
(1 hunks)web/src/app/(dashboard)/t/layout.tsx
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- web/src/app/(dashboard)/d/layout.tsx
- web/src/app/(dashboard)/l/layout.tsx
export default async function Layout({ children }: PropsWithChildren) { | ||
return children; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing the async
keyword if there's no asynchronous operation.
If there's no await statement or asynchronous logic, removing the async
keyword reduces confusion and keeps the function signature simpler.
Optional diff:
-export default async function Layout({ children }: PropsWithChildren) {
+export default function Layout({ children }: PropsWithChildren) {
return children;
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
export default async function Layout({ children }: PropsWithChildren) { | |
return children; | |
export default function Layout({ children }: PropsWithChildren) { | |
return children; |
No description provided.