-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clusters and items #38
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Ignored Deployment
|
Southclaws
changed the title
first pass on API design and data model for clusters and items
clusters and items
Oct 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Storyden and how it may fit into ecom curation without locking itself too far into that domain and still fulfilling the forum goal and generic Wordpress-for-social goal.
Currently we have posts, categories and collections which are effectively all about content and specifically written content (though it can easily extend to media content where one post = one video or multiple photos for example)
If threadbase were to be implemented using SD then this model may not be ideal. Mainly because searchability is determined by rich text and tags rather than structured grouping into brands and styles. For the Houseplant index this also falls down as there’s a finite and discrete set of possible plants but an unlimited growing set of written content that could reference said plant species.
Another concern here is also that if collections were to be social then perhaps they should also have a single parent post that acts as a form of description/thesis/overview.
So, my thoughts for solving this are to maybe introduce two new data models to the system that can act as a form of generic item container/grouping. These could fit into the forum model but also expand out to structured wiki, index, database, producthunt, kind of product direction. I think this is also most likely where the most monetisation and partnership opportunities are and eventually perhaps, as the traditional forum market dies down as a social protocol, where curation can survive and live on lies within the curation product itself.
Of course these would be opt in features for communities and the naming would remain very generic so it doesn’t immediately scream ecom and look like some kind of weird illegitimate tiktok-meets-shopify love child (even though that’s ultimately what I want to build)
So here are the details:
SD stock installations would have the ability to enable item based curation or brand based curation or both in admin settings. This would allow forum operators to essentially upgrade from a content hub to a content hub that also has a wiki of game items or a list of brands.
Along with this should also be the option for enabling user submissions for populating both items and brands while also providing an option for staff reviewing submissions for content moderation purposes.
Overall it feels like scope creep still but I’m also concerned about the long term TAM associated purely with written content because of the rise of AI, apparent death of SEO and just the general ongoing centralisation of social activity on the open web. Even with things like ActivityPub and big Fediverse players like Threads, and varying opinions about privacy, forums are probably not a good long term bet.
That being said, the forum model is still a great OSS market hole to fill for now while using it as a low effort low cost marketing strategy. Open source also continues to offer benefits in the code review space for Makeroom and noteworthy in library communities such as Segun’s Chakra and possibly more partnerships if I can get something rolling with other possibly interested folks. If SD can work well as a “real world example” of certain novel technology products such as Next.js, swr, Fly.io, Panda CSS, Chakra UI, Vercel, and more, then that’s another great funnel.
The end goal with this OSS approach is pretty much just become “Wordpress for X” where our X is community curation.
In the long game, say 2024+, if we can get plugins working well along the trajectory of WASM, that’s not only another real world example marketing channel but could also be the catapult into actual full monetisation via hosted platform with plugin marketplace. The golden goose here (unlike Wordpress) is that Storyden.com will then not only have the best market position for hosting enterprise instances but also provides deep application level integration and extension support without the need for customers to self host - and even if they do there’s a big opportunity for support contracts here too.
Ultimately, Storyden is in a position to really disrupt discussion and community curation while also both utilising and empowering open source communities to be the next internet platform in the same way Wordpress basically powered the internet for the last two decades.