Replies: 1 comment
-
Not specifically, except to have the distributions explicit in each framework. You are free to suggest a different way. Thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
First of all thank you for working on several boosting LSS versions (xgboost, catboost, lightgbm)!
I did notice that both xgb and lightgbm have the (at first sight) exact same
distributions.py
submodule that is thetorch
core of for any distribution supported as a boosting prediction:Is there a specific reason to not share the distribution modules (and any other shared functionality, like plotting of distribution results) in a common Python module that then gets imported/shared as a common dependency here to avoid duplication; and separate development from adding distributions vs adding functionality to the boosting part of the modules.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions