Skip to content

JointSelector question #25

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Why don't you just un-select the foot-joints or keep the ConstantsRemover? The ConstantsRemover automatically puts all constant values back when inverting the pipeline, so you won't loose anything. Training a model on constant features is usually a bad idea...

Replies: 13 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by Svito-zar
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
3 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #19 on February 07, 2021 14:54.