Fix regwidth
& accesswidth
on buffer triggers when trigger is a RegNode
#88
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, in
get_trigger
in theReadBuffering
andWriteBuffering
classes when a read/write buffer trigger is of typeRegNode
, theRegNode
that will be stored is being used to determine theregwidth
andaccesswidth
of the trigger. This is being used to determine how to access the trigger, this is incorrect when the trigger is not the node being stored. Instead, the trigger's properties should be used to determine how to access it.For example, the code snippet (assuming
default accesswidth=32; default regwidth=32
):Would generate code that look like:
Here, the access to
decoded_reg_strb.trigger_reg[0]
would be illegal (at least Questa doesn't permit it), but it would be generated as so becausemy_reg.accesswidth
<my_reg.regwidth
.In truth it's
trigger_reg.accesswidth
andtrigger_reg.regwidth
that should be compared to get the correct access to the trigger.