Replies: 2 comments
-
See https://github.com/orgs/TeamBasedInquiryLearning/projects/4 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
For reference, the current structure we are suggesting is: ON1: Dot Products ON2 would contain orthogonal complements and decomposition, but would only focus on computing projections onto lines. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all,
I have begun updating Module ON by adding to the first section on the dot product. The current two other sections are on projections of vectors and Gram-Schmidt, but they haven't really been built out yet aside from a few definitions. I am proposing making section 2 on Orthogonal Complements, section 3 on Orthogonal Projection, section 4 on Least Squares, and section 5 on Gram-Schmidt. This is in the spirit of what is done in: https://textbooks.math.gatech.edu/ila/index2.html. I like that the big idea is solving Ax\approx b, which is nicely handled once one establishes the benefit of multiplying both side on the left by A^T. I think Gram-Schmidt can be used as a final section for creating nice bases.
I will add that when I taught Computational Linear Algebra in the Spring, that I taught this content from the GA tech book, mostly through lecture. Most of the student feedback said that they missed TBIL and would have preferred that the course stayed that way :)
I don't plan on pulling anything directly from the GA Tech book, but just using it as a reference. I don't plan on finishing all of this this week, but I want to get a good chunk done, or at least establish a framework. So, I am looking to get some discussion on whether this is a reasonable scope for the TBIL book.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions