Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AD3 Activity #49

Open
AbbyANoble opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #110
Open

AD3 Activity #49

AbbyANoble opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #110
Assignees
Labels
calculus enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@AbbyANoble
Copy link
Contributor

In Activity 3.3.11(c), the way it's worded makes it sound like we are looking for the maximum rate of change when I think the intention is to ask which of the choices has the largest rate of change.

In addition, I would recommend changing the wording at the beginning of the activity about the Pythagorean theorem. It seems weird to say also known. It's primarily known as that in the western world. And while I appreciate pointing out that Pythagoras is not solely responsible for that theorem, it feels out of place where it is.

I would recommend a remark similar to Remark 3.3.8: Volume formulas describing the theorem. (Or a theorem environment stating the theorem.) With a remark or "fun fact" after about how the result was well known before him.

@siwelwerd siwelwerd added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 4, 2024
@siwelwerd siwelwerd transferred this issue from TeamBasedInquiryLearning/calculus Jul 19, 2024
@fragandi fragandi self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024
@fragandi
Copy link
Contributor

As the original author, I agree with your points and will take a stab at editing this!

@fragandi fragandi linked a pull request Jul 25, 2024 that will close this issue
@fragandi
Copy link
Contributor

I did not want to bring more attention to the side remark with a new environment, but I have added a separate remark for the theorem and rephrased the side remark with more of a curiosity tone.

I have also rewritten part c), let me know if this is good enough!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
calculus enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants