Skip to content

Coq formalisation of a translation from (an) extensional type theory to (a) weak type theory

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

TheoWinterhalter/ett-to-wtt

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Eliminating Reflection from Type Theory

A translation from extensional type theory (ETT) to weak type theory (WTT)

Authors: Théo Winterhalter and Simon Boulier

Based on previous work with Matthieu Sozeau and Nicolas Tabareau: ett-to-itt. This repository is in fact more or less a fork of the other one.

Quick jump

Overview

This work is a Coq formalisation of a translation from ETT to WTT. Additionally, sorts are handled quite generically (although without cumulativity) which means in particular that we can have a translation from Homotopy Type System (HTS) to Two-Level Weak Type Theory (2WTT) as a direct application.

ETT differs from ITT by the addition of the reflection rule:

Γ ⊢ e : u = v
--------------
  Γ ⊢ u ≡ v

WTT is ITT without any notion of computation or conversion, operations like β-reduction are instead handled directly with propositional equalities.

Installing

Requirements

This project can be compiled with Coq 8.16 and requires Equations 1.3.

You can install those via opam with

opam repo add coq-released https://coq.inria.fr/opam/released
opam update
opam install coq-equations.1.3+8.16

Building

Once you have the dependencies, simply run

make

to build the project (it takes quite some time unfortunately, so you can use options like -j4 to speed up a little bit).

Structure of the project

All of the formalisation can be found in the theories directory.

The file util.v provides useful lemmata that aren't specific to the formalisation.

Syntax

First, Sorts introduces a notion of sort (as a type-class) stating the basic properties required, and provides different instances like the natural number hierarchy, type-in-type, or even HTS/2-level TT. In SAst we define the common syntax to both ETT (Extensional type theory) and WTT in the form of a simple inductive type sterm. Since terms (sterm) are annotated with names—for printing—which are irrelevant for computation and typing, we define an erasure map nl : sterm -> nlterm in Equality from which we derive a decidable equality on sterm. We then define lifting operations, substitution and closedness in SLiftSubst.

Typing

First, in SCommon we define common utility to both ETT and WTT, namely with the definition of contexts (scontext) and global contexts (sglobal_context), the latter containing the declarations of constants. XTyping contains the definition of typing rules of ETT (Σ ;;; Γ |-x t : A), mutually defined with a typed conversion (Σ ;;; Γ |-x t ≡ u : A) and the well-formedness of contexts (wf Σ Γ). ITyping is the same for WTT with the difference that there is no notion of conversion, and that it also defines a notion of well-formedness of global declarations (type_glob Σ).

Lemmata regarding WTT

In ITypingInversions one can find an inversion lemma for each constructor of the syntax, together with the tactic ttinv to apply the right one. In ITypingLemmata are proven a list of different lemmata regarding WTT, including the fact that whenever we have Σ ;;; Γ |-i t : A then A is well sorted and that lifting and substitution preserve typing. A uniqueness of typing lemma for WTT (if Σ ;;; Γ |-i t :A and Σ ;;; Γ |-i t :B then A and B are α-equivalent) is proven in Uniqueness. ITypingAdmissible states admissible rules in ITT.

Translation

PackLifts defines the lifting operations related to packing. Packing consists in taking two types A1 and A2 and yielding the following record type (where x ≅ y stands for heterogenous equality between x and y).

Record Pack A1 A2 := pack {
  ProjT1 : A1 ;
  ProjT2 : A2 ;
  ProjTe : ProjT1 ≅ ProjT2
}.

In order to produce terms as small / efficient as possible, we provide optimised versions of some constructors, for instance, transport between two convertible terms is remapped to identity. Thanks to this, terms that live in WTT should be translated to themselves syntactically (and not just up to transport). This is done in Optim. FundamentalLemma contains the proof of the fundamental lemma, crucial step for our translation. Translation contains the translation from ETT to WTT.

What about the rest?

The remaining files are focused on a final translation from the WTT used above to a simpler version where syntactic sugar is removed. This part is still work-in-progress.

About

Coq formalisation of a translation from (an) extensional type theory to (a) weak type theory

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •  

Languages