Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I would like to add, can we maximise the possibilities of making use of Unicode Characters in field names as well? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
This will cause you a lot of performance problems, because the core doesn't contain any filter optimizations for this type of "relations" yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello every one ...
The liberation of the field names in v5.2.0 will introduce the possibility to revers how we "implement" the relations between Tiddlers.
So,
Now I've the following questions:-
1- Is that design pattern will be native in TW5 or it'll be just a hack?i.e., Is there any restriction while working that way?
2- If we can do it natively (and I hope), the "Relink" plugin ability to rename the "Field Names" will be a key part here. so is there a plan to add this possible to "Relink"?
Thanks in advance
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions