From 2b4d493ddb07e55c6d162212de898f411dcefd14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: robertd17 <32734387+robertd17@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:00:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update guide-03.qmd

---
 guide-03.qmd | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/guide-03.qmd b/guide-03.qmd
index b386da6..3970b30 100644
--- a/guide-03.qmd
+++ b/guide-03.qmd
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Here are suggestions for key actions that can be taken to progress from one leve
 
 ### Open research action plan 
 
-A strategic action plan to develop open research culture and practice may be created and implemented. The plan is likely to identify objectives, deliverables, dates, responsibilities and measures of attainment, and needs to be supported by a commitment of staff time and other resources required for effective implementation. The plan needs to be managed on an ongoing basis, and to demonstrate and report progress against specified milestones to a relevant committee with oversight.3 It should include as one of its objectives to implement recognition and reward for open research in institutional assessment systems. 
+A strategic action plan to develop open research culture and practice may be created and implemented. The plan is likely to identify objectives, deliverables, dates, responsibilities and measures of attainment, and needs to be supported by a commitment of staff time and other resources required for effective implementation. The plan needs to be managed on an ongoing basis, and to demonstrate and report progress against specified milestones to a relevant committee with oversight.^[UKRN provides a ‘Checklist for an Open Research Action Plan’: <https://www.ukrn.org/primers/>. Examples of plans developed by different institutions include: Keele, <https://tinyurl.com/2wehf9xr>; Reading, <https://tinyurl.com/murfjnf2>; Surrey, <https://tinyurl.com/5n7mtbe2>.] It should include as one of its objectives to implement recognition and reward for open research in institutional assessment systems. 
 
 Implementation of recognition and reward for open research may not be directly owned by an open research stakeholder group, as it is likely to sit within wider activity on assessment or similar. An open research lead should ensure that relevant research assessment reform objectives are within the scope of the activity and are appropriately defined and owned by this group. In practice this should entail someone on groups responsible for assessment having a specific brief to represent the open research interest.