Replies: 6 comments 5 replies
-
I really like this idea but I never played with mrs data. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
MRS is a bit trickier to deal with, it depends what type of data you have. For the conversion of data to NIfTI-MRS, I'd use spec2nii that was developed by the same people who have developed the NifTI-MRS data standard and FSL-MRS tool. Once the datasets are converted, that would be doable to reorganize into bids using dcm2bids with the mrs datatype, which should be merged soon into the spec! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is exactly what I did :) Converted with spec2nii. So I'm guessing when
MRS is merged in to BIDS that dcm2bids will then have it as an allowable
datatype?? :)
I looked at the thread. Is there a timeline for mrs to be in the BIDS spec?
I'll have to ask if I'm allowed to share the data right now but I think
there are some sample data that we could track down from one of the mrs
software tutorials and convert it to give it a go.
Best,
Jessica
…On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:44 AM Samuel Guay ***@***.***> wrote:
MRS is a bit trickier to deal with, it depends what type of data you have.
For the conversion of data to NIfTI-MRS, I'd use spec2nii
<https://github.com/wtclarke/spec2nii> that was developed by the same
people who have developed the NifTI-MRS data standard
<https://github.com/wtclarke/mrs_nifti_standard> and FSL-MRS tool.
Once the datasets are converted, that would be doable to reorganize into
bids using dcm2bids with the mrs datatype, which should be merged soon
into the spec
<bids-standard/bids-specification#1377>!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#295 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXAGFI4U7RXXUCSDE33PEFLY76U57AVCNFSM6AAAAABG3KXHFGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TENZWGQYTO>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Jessica N. Busler, M.P.S., Ph.D.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
dcm2bids doesn't need to wait for MRS to be merge into BIDS specification. Arnaud |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ah I must have not done it correctly then in the configuration file. It didn’t organize my mrs files. I thought maybe it was because mrs wasn’t a data type. JessicaOn Apr 30, 2024, at 11:28, Arnaud Bore ***@***.***> wrote:
dcm2bids doesn't need to wait for MRS to be merge into BIDS specification.
You can already organize your MRS data into BIDS with dcm2bids without any issue as long as you have nifti and json files.
Arnaud
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, The current version of dcm2bids did not generate sidecar files for mrs dicom files at all for me, so I ended up using spec2nii for that. However, the issue I had with spec2nii was that the sidecar files that spec2nii generated were identical for all 3 types of mrs files ( In regards to specifications about mrs names: there is a draft version of BIDS v1.9.10. If you will be implementing this I can share my anonymised mrs data with you if that helps! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi! I wanted to suggest adding mrs as and allowable datatype. I know MRS for BIDS is not approved yet and is still listed as an extension proposal for approval but there are some software packages accepting mrs in BIDS format. Is there a way to go ahead and add this in??? Selfishly asking because I just learned how to use dcm2bids and want to also be able to do it with related mrs data :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions