project management changes needed #3949
Replies: 7 comments 5 replies
-
https://blog.packagecloud.io/packagecloud-loves-oss/ https://help.cloudsmith.io/docs/open-source-hosting-policy https://cloudrepo.io/pricing.html Good candidates for the "third party hosting service" https://www.rabbitmq.com/install-rpm.html RabbitMQ is a pretty large project, and they receive support from them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for all of your hard work. I hope a worthy maintainer will step up. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@ehfd thanks, but none of these look like a good fit - I'll read again later. Meanwhile:
So, almost complete. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The mailing list search and replace was a little bit difficult (some links are now dead, ie: subversion links), but now mostly complete. As for hosting, there is another aspect that I should have considered: we have a bunch of redirects from xpra.org URLs to other places. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For the record, we have a single Xpra appreciation thread, but I do get many of these:
It's "funny" how people find the time and energy to complain about decisions they never contributed to. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sad to see, but understandable decision. thank you for your immense effort. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would like to post this update to the mailing list, but I can't, because of gmail: #3555 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As originally posted on the mailing list: project management changes needed (2023-07)
Xpra is being used extensively for critical deployments, worldwide, by
individuals as well as some of the most prestigious organizations on the
planet.
Unfortunately, it seems that very few actually want to contribute to the
project and this means that the project's funding has not been
sustainable for a while.
I was hoping that at least some of the more serious enquiries would
eventually lead somewhere, but it seems they all assumed that someone
else would.
Unless things improve in the next few months, I intend to:
Despite my best efforts to welcome contributions to the project and make
the codebase more approachable, it seems unlikely that anyone will be
able to take over in the short term.
It is slightly frightening to think that users will be left with the
already sub-par downstream packaging for a project of this importance
and size.
I do feel guilty for this messy state of affairs, so I will gladly
listen to any suggestions on how best to protect the future of this
project before I move on.
No matter what happens in the next few weeks / months, I would like to
take this opportunity to thank all past and present sponsors, and all
those who have helped the project until now through contributions of any
kind.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions