Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(rpc): Refactor the cookie-based RPC authentication #8940
fix(rpc): Refactor the cookie-based RPC authentication #8940
Changes from all commits
9bb5716
5026f92
736adfb
b970416
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great, good idea!
Optional: This could be useful elsewhere in Zebra as well, such as in the
testnet::ParametersBuilder
, so it might fit better inzebra-chain
, but it could also be moved in whenever we try implementing it for other structs.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm glad you like it. :) It pretty much randomly occurred to me to do it this way. It seems to go well with something like
let foo = if cond1 {Foo::...with(...)} else if cond2 {Foo::...with(...)} else {Foo::...with(...)}
.Yea, let's move it somewhere else if we're using it in other places.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could maybe add a macro which could take an arbitrary number of arguments:
...with!(a, b, c)
.