Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: Run and report tests on push #17

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023
Merged

CI: Run and report tests on push #17

merged 14 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023

Conversation

nodh
Copy link
Contributor

@nodh nodh commented Sep 1, 2023

No description provided.

@nodh nodh self-assigned this Sep 1, 2023
@nodh nodh force-pushed the feature/ci-test-on-push branch 2 times, most recently from 0f56d7e to 3e99595 Compare September 1, 2023 08:55
@iaik-jheher

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodh

This comment was marked as outdated.

@JesusMcCloud

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodh

This comment was marked as outdated.

Comment on lines +33 to +47

val Base64UrlStrict = Base64(config = Base64ConfigBuilder().apply {
lineBreakInterval = 0
encodeToUrlSafe = true
isLenient = true
padEncoded = false
}.build())


val Base64Strict = Base64(config = Base64ConfigBuilder().apply {
lineBreakInterval = 0
encodeToUrlSafe = false
isLenient = true
padEncoded = true
}.build())
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is it not used everywhere?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this covered in #18 ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, that was very misleading and sloppy! Why don't we want such a shorthand also for Base16?

But come to think of it: Kotlin 1.9 ships with base64 and hex encoding. We might not need the library any more

@nodh

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodh
Copy link
Contributor Author

nodh commented Sep 21, 2023

I think this PR is ready to merge, please review

@nodh nodh merged commit d2d4fd4 into main Sep 22, 2023
2 checks passed
@JesusMcCloud JesusMcCloud mentioned this pull request Sep 22, 2023
@nodh nodh deleted the feature/ci-test-on-push branch November 13, 2023 08:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants