Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: checl if ci takes node from file #94

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

chore: checl if ci takes node from file #94

merged 9 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024

Conversation

a0v0
Copy link
Owner

@a0v0 a0v0 commented Aug 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated CI workflow to simplify job configuration and focus on a single OS for builds.
    • Streamlined Node.js version specification for consistency in testing.
    • Removed unnecessary steps for a more minimalistic CI process.
    • Transitioned to using pnpm for package management in the Checkly workflow.
  • New Features

    • Enhanced workflows by adopting pnpm, improving dependency management performance.
  • Style

    • Renamed the deployment workflow for clarity.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 20, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
avtoolz ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 20, 2024 11:49am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@github-actions[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 99417e9 and 2631db6.

Walkthrough

The recent changes streamline the CI/CD workflows by simplifying job configurations, enhancing compatibility, and focusing on essential tasks. Key modifications include consolidating the testing environment to a single OS, refining Node.js version specifications, and adopting pnpm as the package manager. Additionally, minor adjustments in naming and removal of superfluous steps reflect a more efficient approach to releases and deployments.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/CI.yml Simplified CI workflow by fixing the runs-on parameter to ubuntu-latest and directly specifying node_version as [20]. Removed unnecessary steps like pnpm installation and caching mechanisms, maintaining essential tasks.
.github/workflows/release.yml Updated node-version to node_version in the release job, upgraded checkout action to v4, and replaced Node.js setup with pnpm action, enhancing workflow compatibility and performance.
.github/workflows/checkly.yml Shifted dependency management from npm to pnpm by replacing setup and installation commands, improving performance and efficiency.
.github/workflows/vercel.yaml Corrected the workflow name from "Production Tag Deployment" to "Vercel Deploymnet" without impacting functionality.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant CI/CD
    participant Vercel
    Developer->>CI/CD: Trigger build
    CI/CD->>Vercel: Deploy application
    Vercel-->>CI/CD: Deployment success
    CI/CD->>Developer: Notify completion
Loading

🐇 In the meadow, changes bloom,
With simplified paths, there's plenty of room.
From npm to pnpm, a swift little hop,
SEO shines bright, making us stop!
Let's celebrate with joy, oh what a delight,
Our workflow's more nimble, it feels just right! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/release.yml (2)

15-15: Inconsistent use of node_version and node-version.

The workflow file uses both node_version and node-version, which can lead to errors. Ensure that a consistent naming convention is applied throughout the file. Consider updating all instances to use node_version to match the matrix declaration.

  • Line with node_version: [20.x]
  • Line with node-version: ${{ matrix.node_version }}
Analysis chain

Ensure consistency with node_version key.

The renaming of node-version to node_version should be consistent throughout the workflow. Double-check that all references to this key have been updated accordingly.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistent use of `node_version` in the workflow.

# Test: Search for occurrences of `node_version` in the workflow file.
rg --type yaml 'node_version' .github/workflows/release.yml

Length of output: 141


31-33: Replace npm-specific command with pnpm equivalent.

The workflow contains an npm-specific command (npm ci) that should be updated to ensure compatibility with pnpm. Consider replacing it with pnpm install --frozen-lockfile or another appropriate pnpm command.

  • Line in .github/workflows/release.yml: - run: HUSKY=0 npm ci
Analysis chain

Verify compatibility with pnpm setup.

The switch to wyvox/action-setup-pnpm@v3 suggests using pnpm as the package manager. Ensure all steps in the workflow are compatible with pnpm and adjust any npm-specific commands if necessary.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify compatibility of workflow steps with pnpm.

# Test: Search for npm-specific commands in the workflow file.
rg --type yaml 'npm ' .github/workflows/release.yml

Length of output: 81

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a220c2 and b91d4b9.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/CI.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/vercel.yaml (1 hunks)
  • todo.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .github/workflows/CI.yml
  • .github/workflows/vercel.yaml
  • todo.md
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

26-27: Update to checkout@v4 approved.

The update from actions/checkout@v3 to actions/checkout@v4 is a positive change, likely improving performance or compatibility. Ensure that the rest of the workflow is compatible with this version.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b91d4b9 and 7dadbd9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/checkly.yml (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/checkly.yml (4)

50-50: Verify pnpx checkly test execution.

Ensure that pnpx is configured correctly to execute the checkly test command. Verify that all necessary dependencies are available and correctly resolved by pnpm.

Verification successful

Verification successful for pnpx checkly test.

The checkly package is listed as a dependency in the project's package.json, confirming that pnpx can execute the checkly test command correctly. No issues found with this configuration.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the execution of `pnpx checkly test`.

# Test: Check for any issues or documentation related to using `pnpx` with `checkly`.
gh repo view checkly --web

Length of output: 127


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if `checkly` is listed as a dependency in package.json files.

# Search for `checkly` in package.json to verify its presence as a dependency.
fd package.json --exec cat {} + | jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies | select(. != null) | keys' | grep 'checkly'

Length of output: 163


59-59: Verify pnpx checkly deploy execution.

Ensure that pnpx is correctly configured to execute the checkly deploy command. Verify that the deployment process works as expected with pnpm.


46-46: Confirm the use of pnpm i for installation.

Ensure that pnpm i is the appropriate command for installing dependencies in your CI environment. Consider using pnpm install --frozen-lockfile if you want to ensure that the lockfile is honored, similar to npm ci.


33-35: Verify pnpm setup action compatibility.

Ensure that wyvox/action-setup-pnpm@v3 correctly sets up both Node.js and pnpm. Check for any specific configuration requirements or compatibility issues with your existing project setup.

Verification successful

The wyvox/action-setup-pnpm@v3 action is compatible with your project setup.

The README of the wyvox/action-setup-pnpm repository confirms that it correctly sets up Node.js and pnpm, with options for configuring node-version, node-version-file, and pnpm-version. No compatibility issues were found in the repository's issues section. Therefore, the action should integrate well with your workflow.

  • Ensure that your workflow configuration matches the options provided in the README for optimal setup.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify compatibility of `wyvox/action-setup-pnpm@v3` with the project.

# Test: Check the repository for any documentation or issues related to the action.
gh repo view wyvox/action-setup-pnpm --web

Length of output: 131


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Fetch README or documentation files from the wyvox/action-setup-pnpm repository

# Clone the repository to inspect its contents
gh repo clone wyvox/action-setup-pnpm wyvox-action-setup-pnpm

# Search for README or documentation files for setup instructions
rg -i 'setup|compatibility|pnpm|node' wyvox-action-setup-pnpm/README.md wyvox-action-setup-pnpm/docs/

Length of output: 3098


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for issues related to compatibility in the wyvox/action-setup-pnpm repository

# List issues in the repository that might mention compatibility
gh issue list --repo wyvox/action-setup-pnpm --state all --search "compatibility setup pnpm node"

Length of output: 99

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7dadbd9 and 99417e9.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/CI.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/checkly.yml (4 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • .github/workflows/CI.yml
  • .github/workflows/checkly.yml
  • .github/workflows/release.yml

@a0v0 a0v0 merged commit b404cfd into main Aug 20, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@a0v0 a0v0 deleted the necessary-work branch August 20, 2024 11:58
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.3 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant