Add a layer for existing cycle paths. #299 #313
Conversation
| }, | ||
| "red" | ||
| ), | ||
| width: [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adapted from https://github.com/bdon/HighRoadPlus/blob/main/highroadplus.js. Keeping lines the same thickness at all zoom levels doesn't make sense, because it's hard to click things when zoomed in, and at low zoom, things overlap badly. I fiddled with this only a little bit to make it look OK, happy for suggestions.
More generally, hovering/tooltips/clicking at low zoom levels for many of our layers isn't really appropriate. Need to revisit more generally
| </p> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li> | ||
| <b>Separated tracks</b> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Likely someone outside our team needs to review the wording choices here
| // Draw most things beneath text road labels. This is the only layer in this | ||
| // list generated by the MapTiler basemap we use. | ||
| // Draw most things beneath text road labels. These IDs come from the | ||
| // MapTiler basemap, and there are different ones for each basemap. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I noticed when we switched to the new dataviz style, labels got incorrectly buried. Fixing that here
|
Sounds really promising. Taking a look! |
|
Simple sanity check for Leeds passes the test, this has the main ones:
There are traffic calming interventions that may be worth adding. Main bit of feedback on this: important to have Walking infrastructure also, may be harder.. |
|
Overall: big 👍 |
Demo: https://acteng.github.io/atip/cycle_path_layer/browse.html
See issue for big TODOs and reference maps.